Quote (gnarjay @ Jan 3 2024 12:19pm)
interesting that you pivoted from "homelessness isnt actually a problem" to "given the epidemic that its become, in 20 years we will have zoned off parts of large cities because there are too many homeless" lol
lets look at some stats
do you think this system sets kids up for success?
do you think women who arent able to raise their children (for whatever reason) should be able to get abortions?
im not pivotting, you just misunderstood what i even meant.
if we define homelessness like you did, by citing the foster care stats, then it isn't a massive problem. because those stats capture a LOT of people that are without a permanent home for a VERY short time, compared to the terminally homeless. that means the system, in some places, is working as its intended. homeless shelters are designed to feed and safely house people for a temporary amount of time before they can get into a more permanent housing situation.
but really its just a matter of prioritization. we can make changes to the foster system, like paying foster parents to something like age 20 or 22. but its unlikely to do much but postpone the issues a few years. i dont see much to suggest this would change the reality that some percent of foster kids, or people generally, eventually get addicted to terrible drugs and/or are mentally ill, and become terminally homeless. i havent seen any good studies on how to stop that transition in any meaningful way from which we can pass legislation to change it. we could obviously spend a hundred thousand dollars per year on each foster kid in america and prevent most of it, but that will never happen.
if we want to combat problematic homelessness, and that is terminal homelessness, the key is to attack substance abuse and mental illness. and keep in mind im almost always a root cause problem solver, but i dont see any changes to the foster system that i think will prevent that.
as to your questions, no, the foster care system is a barely functional underfunded mess.
and yes, i am unequivocally pro choice. i still think we should bolster systems to support those who dont, the state should never fund it, and especially changes to the adoption system are needed. its still a morally gross practice.