d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > It Has Been A Year And A Half Now
Prev1234Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 47,030
Joined: Jun 6 2015
Gold: 40,503.67
Jan 3 2024 11:49am
Quote (thesnipa @ Jan 2 2024 09:33am)
just what the world needs, more poor unwanted children. a real win for all.


This

Anyone against abortion is an absolute fool
Member
Posts: 25,139
Joined: Dec 20 2006
Gold: 82,014.68
Warn: 10%
Jan 3 2024 11:50am
Quote (YeeHaw @ Jan 3 2024 04:30am)
So I mentioned exactly this in my OP. Obviously the extreme rare cases where abortion is necessary to save the mother’s life will end up in the mother dying. If you go back and find the topic I made about this last year I pulled up the only article I could find actually getting down to facts. And it was less than 20 women.

These are quotes from your articles, which if you went beyond the headline include word salad of absolutely zero substance.





The race bait article where the only numbers they gave were how natives were something like 4% more likely to have maternal problems than blacks was pretty asinine.


I’ve never seen you respond to me so I will pretend you aren’t being a dick head, despite how people who call others “pseudo intellectual” are pretty much 100% pseudo intellectual themselves. I’ve never claimed to be an intellectual, which is likely why those who do pretend to be can’t stand anything I say because I consistently expose them as tribalist idiots.


The entire point of my OP is that mortality has increased, there was always a 100% chance it would, but if you look at the numbers it is insanely minuscule. I never prophesied bodies littering the streets. That was your cnn abc nbc the hill etc..






" I am the light of the world: he that followeth me
shall not walk in darkness,
but shall have the light of life.





"Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; & every city or house divided against itself
shall not stand.

"in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, &
the dead will be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed."





https://www.britannica.com/science/messenger-RNA
https://ibb.co/fFXqs1s
Member
Posts: 92,954
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Jan 3 2024 12:05pm
Quote (gnarjay @ Jan 3 2024 11:45am)
They've never been an issue? according to whom? it's a top 5 problem that conservatives bitch about, for sure



who do you think uses drugs and has mental health issues? maybe kids that grow up in abusive foster homes?


it all depends on how you define "homeless people".

are we talking about people in the grips of a drug addiction with mental health issues that live on the street for years at a time and have zero chance for upward mobility without drastic outside intervention? if that's what homeless person is, then yes, those people are a massive problem.

are we talking about someone who doesnt have a permanent home and spends a week in a shelter? or even a month in a shelter? who uses food pantries, and has the chance to find a job and permanent place to live on a relatively short time span? then no, comparatively those people aren't a problem.

some people who leave foster care are the type 1, drug addicted mentally ill terminally homeless people. some, a far larger number, are type 2. and when we read % of foster care people who are homeless at some point that's a catch all stat which represents both problematic and far less problematic cases of homeless people.

im not sure why im explaining this in such detail, its a pretty basic fact that anyone would know. drugs and mental health are the ways to combat homelessness. changes to the foster care system wont do much of anything to reduce homeless numbers. then again given the epidemic that terminal homelessness has become in the USA im not sure its an issue that we can solve. i bet we're likely 10-20 years from zoning off entire parts of large cities to be dead zones where homeless just go to live forever with almost zero police intervention. no one is at all interested in combatting it, just lip service. the bill is far too large to actually do it.
Member
Posts: 19,232
Joined: Oct 23 2003
Gold: 7,104.95
Jan 3 2024 12:19pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Jan 3 2024 10:05am)
it all depends on how you define "homeless people".

are we talking about people in the grips of a drug addiction with mental health issues that live on the street for years at a time and have zero chance for upward mobility without drastic outside intervention? if that's what homeless person is, then yes, those people are a massive problem.

are we talking about someone who doesnt have a permanent home and spends a week in a shelter? or even a month in a shelter? who uses food pantries, and has the chance to find a job and permanent place to live on a relatively short time span? then no, comparatively those people aren't a problem.

some people who leave foster care are the type 1, drug addicted mentally ill terminally homeless people. some, a far larger number, are type 2. and when we read % of foster care people who are homeless at some point that's a catch all stat which represents both problematic and far less problematic cases of homeless people.

im not sure why im explaining this in such detail, its a pretty basic fact that anyone would know. drugs and mental health are the ways to combat homelessness. changes to the foster care system wont do much of anything to reduce homeless numbers. then again given the epidemic that terminal homelessness has become in the USA im not sure its an issue that we can solve. i bet we're likely 10-20 years from zoning off entire parts of large cities to be dead zones where homeless just go to live forever with almost zero police intervention. no one is at all interested in combatting it, just lip service. the bill is far too large to actually do it.


interesting that you pivoted from "homelessness isnt actually a problem" to "given the epidemic that its become, in 20 years we will have zoned off parts of large cities because there are too many homeless" lol


lets look at some stats

Quote
More than 23,000 children will age out of the US foster care system every year.
After reaching the age of 18, 20% of the children who were in foster care will become instantly homeless.
Only 1 out of every 2 foster kids who age out of the system will have some form of gainful employment by the age of 24.
There is less than a 3% chance for children who have aged out of foster care to earn a college degree at any point in their life.
7 out of 10 girls who age out of the foster care system will become pregnant before the age of 21.
The percentage of children who age out of the foster care system and still suffer from the direct effects of PTSD: 25%.
Tens of thousands of children in the foster care system were taken away from their parents after extreme abuse.
8% of the total child population of the United States is represented by reports of abuse that are given to authorities in the United States annually.
In 2015, more than 20,000 young people — whom states failed to reunite with their families or place in permanent homes.


do you think this system sets kids up for success?
do you think women who arent able to raise their children (for whatever reason) should be able to get abortions?
Member
Posts: 92,954
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Jan 3 2024 12:29pm
Quote (gnarjay @ Jan 3 2024 12:19pm)
interesting that you pivoted from "homelessness isnt actually a problem" to "given the epidemic that its become, in 20 years we will have zoned off parts of large cities because there are too many homeless" lol


lets look at some stats



do you think this system sets kids up for success?
do you think women who arent able to raise their children (for whatever reason) should be able to get abortions?


im not pivotting, you just misunderstood what i even meant.

if we define homelessness like you did, by citing the foster care stats, then it isn't a massive problem. because those stats capture a LOT of people that are without a permanent home for a VERY short time, compared to the terminally homeless. that means the system, in some places, is working as its intended. homeless shelters are designed to feed and safely house people for a temporary amount of time before they can get into a more permanent housing situation.

but really its just a matter of prioritization. we can make changes to the foster system, like paying foster parents to something like age 20 or 22. but its unlikely to do much but postpone the issues a few years. i dont see much to suggest this would change the reality that some percent of foster kids, or people generally, eventually get addicted to terrible drugs and/or are mentally ill, and become terminally homeless. i havent seen any good studies on how to stop that transition in any meaningful way from which we can pass legislation to change it. we could obviously spend a hundred thousand dollars per year on each foster kid in america and prevent most of it, but that will never happen.

if we want to combat problematic homelessness, and that is terminal homelessness, the key is to attack substance abuse and mental illness. and keep in mind im almost always a root cause problem solver, but i dont see any changes to the foster system that i think will prevent that.

as to your questions, no, the foster care system is a barely functional underfunded mess.

and yes, i am unequivocally pro choice. i still think we should bolster systems to support those who dont, the state should never fund it, and especially changes to the adoption system are needed. its still a morally gross practice.
Member
Posts: 530
Joined: Mar 16 2018
Gold: 336.86
Jan 3 2024 06:42pm
Quote (YeeHaw @ Jan 3 2024 08:30am)
So I mentioned exactly this in my OP. Obviously the extreme rare cases where abortion is necessary to save the mother’s life will end up in the mother dying. If you go back and find the topic I made about this last year I pulled up the only article I could find actually getting down to facts. And it was less than 20 women.

These are quotes from your articles, which if you went beyond the headline include word salad of absolutely zero substance.





The race bait article where the only numbers they gave were how natives were something like 4% more likely to have maternal problems than blacks was pretty asinine.


I’ve never seen you respond to me so I will pretend you aren’t being a dick head, despite how people who call others “pseudo intellectual” are pretty much 100% pseudo intellectual themselves. I’ve never claimed to be an intellectual, which is likely why those who do pretend to be can’t stand anything I say because I consistently expose them as tribalist idiots.


The entire point of my OP is that mortality has increased, there was always a 100% chance it would, but if you look at the numbers it is insanely minuscule. I never prophesied bodies littering the streets. That was your cnn abc nbc the hill etc..


so you admit you are wrong.

thanks
Member
Posts: 40,248
Joined: Feb 14 2007
Gold: 5,737.99
Jan 3 2024 06:52pm
Abortions are just dead liberals, you’d think more conservatives would support them
Member
Posts: 27,048
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
Jan 3 2024 08:35pm
Quote (SBD @ Jan 2 2024 11:49am)
Who do you think is ending up in prison that you are now in favour of killing?


thats too much information for him to follow it takes more than 1 emotional reaction.
Member
Posts: 25,139
Joined: Dec 20 2006
Gold: 82,014.68
Warn: 10%
Jan 4 2024 06:40pm
Quote (IgoSoHard @ Jan 3 2024 04:52pm)
Abortions are just dead liberals, you’d think more conservatives would support them


more like dead conservatives under liberal rule.

5-0'd.
Member
Posts: 34,186
Joined: May 25 2007
Gold: 21.00
Warn: 10%
Jan 4 2024 07:11pm
Quote (IgoSoHard @ Jan 3 2024 04:52pm)
Abortions are just dead liberals, you’d think more conservatives would support them


Quote (lodd222 @ Jan 4 2024 04:40pm)
more like dead conservatives under liberal rule.

5-0'd.


Many conservatives come from liberal families (myself included). But that sentiment is likely why many conservatives are ambivalent on the issue.

Justin Beiber was almost aborted by his teen mother. She chose life instead and now look at him, he has produced billions of dollars in economic activity.

It's a leftist myth that aborted children are better off dead because they never amount to anything (which is also a sick, evil, Nazi, eugenics point of view)

This post was edited by El1te on Jan 4 2024 07:13pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1234Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll