Bigger question is why the cops were not immediately tested for alcohol or other drugs. By not doing so, you can’t even more doubt and ambiguity on the rookie (by definition, cops for <1year) cops in question

If any other person crashed into a bar with people inside there would be a laundry list of charges

“There was no reasonable suspicion they were intoxicated”

Also no dash cam footage, no body cam footage released yet, the only footage is from the bar owner

amateur hour. This case will settle with tax payer dollars

This post was edited by Bazi on Dec 22 2023 06:05pm

Making me more libertarian by the sentence

Simps gonna simp

If you judge whether the entire law enforcement is corrupt by whether there are a few bad officers, then this principle applies to pretty much all facets of the public life we can think of. For example, there are bad, corrupt judges here and there, but according to you, this means there are no good judges whatsoever. This is not true.

But in a way I sort of see your point. If police departments don't do anything to root out bad apples, that really says something about them. So I don't know.

Judges are not in a cohort the way police officers are.

If a judge knowingly abides another judge's corruption the way virtually all police officers do for each other, they are bad judges. Pure and simple.

There are some good departments. They just tend not to be in notable cities.

This made me lol.

Are you this cute in real life too.

There's 800,000 police in the US. Do you understand arithmetic?

One bad apple spoils the bunch. If you work with corruption you are an accomplice.

Maybe some officers are not corrupt but they think that they are just one person, they can't really do much to change the whole institution.

Sometimes doing the right thing is hard.