Quote (thesnipa @ Nov 8 2023 11:41am)
No. texas argued that changing election laws (not breaking them) without legislative procedure to do so, broke the US constitution. and the SCOTUS decided (correctly) that the only constitutional issue was the lack of standing one state has to file a suit against another state, because without an interstate contention Texas has no business suing Penn.
the flip side of this would be precedent by the US federal govt stating that no individual state is allowed to change it's own state election procedures, large or small, without legislative action to do so. this would make the process far too rigid for issues that arise in the short term. also the Federal govt has no business telling states how to conduct their own elections, within reason. and given differences in the state constitutions this would be federal over-reach to standardize state election practices. it was an objective loss for state's rights, ironic it came from republicans.
When you magically declare something a law without going through a legislative process, it isn’t a law.. Therefore the existing laws were broken.