Quote (majorblood @ Sep 26 2023 12:41pm)
we need cheap energy, you can't really just divest from oil without enormous advancements. You can be in support of alternative fuel sources, such as advocating for more nuclear energy, but banning fracking (immediate or not) would not support your desire to be less dependent on opec and obviously would have the opposite effect.
its almost a tale of 2 conversations. what do i want a president to do (not ban fracking but study and perhaps act on the worst effects, support nuclear, fund EC infrastructure advancement) and what do i want to see long term (fracking eventually stopped due to pricing, far more nuclear plants, more readily available EC infrastructure).
i think the most immediate action on fracking should be done at the state level, who tend to know the issues, economics, and their own water tables far better than the fed.