posting in a misogynist thread, sadly.

do better, OP

This post was edited by ChocolateCoveredGummyBears on Sep 28 2023 01:29am

Do you want a thoughtful exchange, or not? Cause I will just ignore all your posts from now on if you gonna talk like that.

Disallowing all women to vote on the basis that they are unproductive is incorrect and irrational, since many many women are more productive than men are (going by purely statistics, it's possible that women are actually more productive than men are in this day and age, there are ALOT of men who do absolutely nothing yet still vote - look at Reddit for example)

A proper argument would be that non-productive people in general should not be allowed to vote

In truth, if someone (men or women) receives support from the government they should not be allowed to vote, because voting creates a conflict of interest - they are incentivized to vote not for the good of the nation but for whoever will give them the most free stuff.

Allowing absolutely anyone to vote regardless of their contribution to the nation (hint: black people who do nothing but loot, rob, murder and steal can still vote) is the reason why we're in such a terrible place right now.

I agree with you that people who receive government handouts will vote for more money for themselves, however, I believe this is true for pretty much everybody. Almost everyone will vote for a government that will give them more benefits or money. Very few people will vote for the common good or what's good for the country.

Definitely - this is why anyone who receives government handouts must be disqualified from voting - this eliminates the conflict of interest

the reason is simple, if we dont let them they will become violent and start to hurt people by bombing polling stations, just like the first time around.

you are far too attention seeking to do that lmao, dont lie to yourself sunny

Agreed. So nobody involved in any way with a corporation. Those corporations depend on public infrastructure and therefore receive government handouts. Amazon didn't build the roads they use to deliver packages after all.

Similarly, nobody in a public job. So no police voting either.

I like the way you think. This is a good system.

This post was edited by NetflixAdaptationWidow on Sep 28 2023 03:05pm

I agree, however the scope of who should be disqualified should be narrowed to who is actually making the decisions & involved in the corporate-government communications & decisions. Not the workers or mid level managers of these companies. There is however a distinction between government handouts and public infrastructure - public infrastructure is purely equal by definition as every resident has access to it, thus is moot. Government handouts are selective as are certain corporate "incentives"

As to jobs funded by the taxpayer, I also absolutely agree. It's a straight conflict of interest.

This is a ridiculous opinion. Trucking causes thousands of times more damage than cars despite being a fraction of the traffic. Amazon makes billions by using the roads constantly while I make a salary using it once or twice a day. Public infrastructure is often specifically built out to support specific industries.

Do better.