d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Trump 2024
Prev1194195196197198281Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 91,085
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,504.69
Mar 18 2024 02:18pm
Quote (gnarjay @ Mar 18 2024 02:04pm)
he would have had to pay the banks 100m++ in interest if he would have told the truth about his assets instead of over-valuing them. it turns out that that practice is illegal and its called fraud, who knew?


And the banks that were supposedly shorted interest testified in his favor lol. trump keeps getting "owned" in civil courts, where the standard of proof is lower, odd huh?

of course anyone with an IQ over lukewarm can see it actually increases his chances to win in 2024. just another self own by the democrats.

and the precedent will likely drive down business in new york, so another self own by the state.

banks left themselves open to massive amounts of over leveraged on loans, but this ruling actually strengthens banks. it takes due diligence even further off their responsibility legally. leftists have lost their way. first it was stumping for pharmaceutical corporations, now they're pro bank lol. im not even an anti vaxxer but there is no such thing as a good corporation, that was a staple of the progressive movement. there are no good billionaires and there are no good fortune 500 companies, right?

This post was edited by thesnipa on Mar 18 2024 02:18pm
Member
Posts: 33,652
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,617.52
Mar 18 2024 02:33pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Mar 18 2024 04:18pm)
And the banks that were supposedly shorted interest testified in his favor lol. trump keeps getting "owned" in civil courts, where the standard of proof is lower, odd huh?

of course anyone with an IQ over lukewarm can see it actually increases his chances to win in 2024. just another self own by the democrats.

and the precedent will likely drive down business in new york, so another self own by the state.

banks left themselves open to massive amounts of over leveraged on loans, but this ruling actually strengthens banks. it takes due diligence even further off their responsibility legally. leftists have lost their way. first it was stumping for pharmaceutical corporations, now they're pro bank lol. im not even an anti vaxxer but there is no such thing as a good corporation, that was a staple of the progressive movement. there are no good billionaires and there are no good fortune 500 companies, right?


Yea. don't all of us feel real bad, teary-eyed even, over those poor, poor killer shark banks losing a few dollars in a deal for once in their life.

The same banks they protested back in 2009 too.

Member
Posts: 17,169
Joined: Oct 23 2003
Gold: 19,646.95
Mar 18 2024 02:42pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Mar 18 2024 01:18pm)
And the banks that were supposedly shorted interest testified in his favor lol. trump keeps getting "owned" in civil courts, where the standard of proof is lower, odd huh?

of course anyone with an IQ over lukewarm can see it actually increases his chances to win in 2024. just another self own by the democrats.

and the precedent will likely drive down business in new york, so another self own by the state.

banks left themselves open to massive amounts of over leveraged on loans, but this ruling actually strengthens banks. it takes due diligence even further off their responsibility legally. leftists have lost their way. first it was stumping for pharmaceutical corporations, now they're pro bank lol. im not even an anti vaxxer but there is no such thing as a good corporation, that was a staple of the progressive movement. there are no good billionaires and there are no good fortune 500 companies, right?


the stooge at Deutsche bank? one of the most corrupt banks in the world? LOL

the same Deutsche bank that got slapped by multiple governing bodies because they allowed their customers to launder money/accept laundered money, some customers being russian oligarchs. the SAME BANK that continued to lend Trump money after he defaulted on a 600M debt to them.

LOL

Quote
“I think we expect clients-provided information to be accurate. At the same time, it’s not an industry standard that these statements be audited. They’re largely reliant on the use of estimates,” Williams said, so bankers routinely “make some adjustments.”



its fraud no matter how you spin it. he inflated his wealth to get lower interest rates( to the tune of over a hundred million dollars). idk what is so hard for MAGA hogs to understand about this




https://www.worldfinance.com/strategy/deutsche-bank-loaned-trump-2bn-despite-multiple-red-flags-new-report-claims

Quote
At a time when Trump was considered “a Wall Street pariah”, Deutsche Bank provided over $2bn in loans over the course of two decades, The New York Times reported. The US president is alleged to have bribed Deutsche executives to sign off bond and loan deals with trips to Mar-a-Lago and flights on his private jet. He also reportedly inflated his net worth to $3bn in order to secure loans, which continued to be approved by the bank even after it discovered Trump was worth closer to $788m.


This post was edited by gnarjay on Mar 18 2024 02:44pm
Member
Posts: 23,843
Joined: Dec 20 2006
Gold: 80,771.69
Mar 18 2024 03:10pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Mar 18 2024 01:18pm)
And the banks that were supposedly shorted interest testified in his favor lol. trump keeps getting "owned" in civil courts, where the standard of proof is lower, odd huh?

of course anyone with an IQ over lukewarm can see it actually increases his chances to win in 2024. just another self own by the democrats.

and the precedent will likely drive down business in new york, so another self own by the state.

banks left themselves open to massive amounts of over leveraged on loans, but this ruling actually strengthens banks. it takes due diligence even further off their responsibility legally. leftists have lost their way. first it was stumping for pharmaceutical corporations, now they're pro bank lol. im not even an anti vaxxer but there is no such thing as a good corporation, that was a staple of the progressive movement. there are no good billionaires and there are no good fortune 500 companies, right?


word salad. seek help and keep drinking tap water

Member
Posts: 39,256
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 0.69
Mar 18 2024 03:29pm
Quote (Prox1m1ty @ Mar 18 2024 12:41pm)
“if I don’t get elected it’s going to be a bloodbath for the whole—that’s gonna be the least of it”


need to see it in context. ev1 laughing at REEEEEing fake news

Quote (gnarjay @ Mar 18 2024 01:04pm)
he would have had to pay the banks 100m++ in interest if he would have told the truth about his assets instead of over-valuing them. it turns out that that practice is illegal and its called fraud, who knew?


ya ya judges deciding property values. its like they trying to look stupid. pay a hooker out of wrong account. never cared one iota bout secret documents till trump had some.......... maybe some day u gona get to kick the football

Member
Posts: 34,303
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 222.37
Mar 18 2024 03:38pm
Quote (gnarjay @ Mar 18 2024 04:42pm)
the stooge at Deutsche bank? one of the most corrupt banks in the world? LOL

the same Deutsche bank that got slapped by multiple governing bodies because they allowed their customers to launder money/accept laundered money, some customers being russian oligarchs. the SAME BANK that continued to lend Trump money after he defaulted on a 600M debt to them.

LOL




its fraud no matter how you spin it. he inflated his wealth to get lower interest rates( to the tune of over a hundred million dollars). idk what is so hard for MAGA hogs to understand about this




https://www.worldfinance.com/strategy/deutsche-bank-loaned-trump-2bn-despite-multiple-red-flags-new-report-claims


The banks agree that they suffered no loss, performed their own evaluations (i.e. of course), and would be happy to do business with Trump again. Fines of this magnitude have never been applied in a case where there is victim and there is no loss. They're being applied to Trump specifically because he is an enemy of Democratic-run New York. Hochul acknowledged all of this as she begged businesses not to leave in the wake of the ruling, promising that it really was a "Get Trump" operation.

Member
Posts: 39,362
Joined: Feb 14 2007
Gold: 2,009.99
Mar 18 2024 04:34pm
Quote (Prox1m1ty @ Mar 18 2024 02:41pm)
“if I don’t get elected it’s going to be a bloodbath for the whole—that’s gonna be the least of it”

If you watch the video instead of reading headlines, he’s very clearly talking about China building a car manufacturing factory in *Mexico.
Member
Posts: 19,783
Joined: Apr 13 2016
Gold: 32,517.50
Mar 18 2024 04:36pm
Quote (IgoSoHard @ Mar 18 2024 10:34pm)
If you watch the video instead of reading headlines, he’s very clearly talking about China building a car manufacturing factory in *Mexico.


I've watched it. Did you watch the part where trump saluted the insurectionists while they sang the national anthem from prison?

Did I dream that happened?

This post was edited by Prox1m1ty on Mar 18 2024 04:36pm
Member
Posts: 17,169
Joined: Oct 23 2003
Gold: 19,646.95
Mar 18 2024 04:44pm
Quote (bogie160 @ Mar 18 2024 02:38pm)
The banks agree that they suffered no loss, performed their own evaluations (i.e. of course), and would be happy to do business with Trump again. Fines of this magnitude have never been applied in a case where there is victim and there is no loss. They're being applied to Trump specifically because he is an enemy of Democratic-run New York. Hochul acknowledged all of this as she begged businesses not to leave in the wake of the ruling, promising that it really was a "Get Trump" operation.


literally everything in your post is false
Member
Posts: 39,362
Joined: Feb 14 2007
Gold: 2,009.99
Mar 18 2024 05:38pm
Quote (Prox1m1ty @ Mar 18 2024 05:36pm)
I've watched it

So you saw he’s very clearly talking about China building a car manufacturing factory in Mexico.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1194195196197198281Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll