IF Putin was betting on one of the horses, I would think he would choose Clinton. He already KNOWS she can be bought, and further that she can keep her mouth shut and can get away with it.
We also know that Trump gets upset and runs his mouth, when he shouldn't.
Further, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that a lot of folks would be pissed if Clinton lost. So Putin would realize that if Trump won, Trump would be fighting an uphill battle the whole way.
Not exactly the horse I would back if I was Putin and wanted leverage in the US or over the US.
/e
Quote (Goomshill @ Jun 4 2018 11:58pm)
In fact, nobody thought Trump was going to win, Putin included
that's a major point in understanding the dynamics and motivations, because it explains well how Putin was interfering to hurt Hillary in tit-for-tat retaliation against her 2011 violations of sovereignty against him, but was not motivated by trying to 'help Trump'. And thats why the nuance of 'help Trump' vs 'hurt Hillary' is something that politically motivated actors in the IC and media keep spinning wildly. They aren't the same. If Putin just assumed Hillary was going to easily win anyway, then pulling down her pants during the 2016 election was his power play to rattle her cage and Trump wasn't even a real factor in his decision making.
It's all about that 4D chess crap, doncha know.
This post was edited by Ghot on Jun 4 2018 10:12pm