d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Election Was Rigged, Trap Was Set, Its Coming
Prev1193419351936193719381965Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 46,851
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Apr 22 2022 12:26pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Apr 22 2022 11:23am)
Biden has approved more drilling than Trump. The only thing he cancelled was Keystone, which wasn't going to pump until next year at the absolute earliest.

Pathetic that you can only parrot bitchute instead of really looking at the data.


trunalimunumaprzure :rofl:

laughing since they closed all those polls in the middle of the night and its been a heehaw ever since.

This post was edited by TiStuff on Apr 22 2022 12:33pm
Member
Posts: 10,525
Joined: Feb 9 2022
Gold: 425.70
Apr 22 2022 12:49pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Apr 22 2022 01:23pm)
Biden has approved more drilling than Trump. The only thing he cancelled was Keystone, which wasn't going to pump until next year at the absolute earliest.

Pathetic that you can only parrot bitchute instead of really looking at the data.



So your saying the pipeline would be pumping gas right now if he hadn’t cancelled it… thus making gas cheaper…

He chose higher gas… it’s not me reciting bitchute… it’s the truth he is the one to blame for higher gas prices

Which is why I say

FUCK JOE BIDEN
Member
Posts: 18
Joined: Apr 21 2022
Gold: 1.74
Apr 22 2022 12:56pm
it was all George's fault
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Apr 22 2022 01:01pm
Quote (Defendor @ Apr 22 2022 01:49pm)
So your saying the pipeline would be pumping gas right now if he hadn’t cancelled it… thus making gas cheaper…

He chose higher gas… it’s not me reciting bitchute… it’s the truth he is the one to blame for higher gas prices

Which is why I say

FUCK JOE BIDEN


No. He's saying that, if it had not been cancelled, and construction had continued as scheduled, it still wouldn't be carrying oil until next year. And TransCanada themselves admitted in their filings with the Canadian government that the XL would likely increase prices at the pump in the American Midwest by around $0.15/gallon, due to the removal of oversupply.

Page 20 of this PDF (marked as page 225 in the document numbering): https://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=ubjld
Member
Posts: 46,851
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Apr 22 2022 01:03pm
Quote (Surfpunk @ Apr 22 2022 12:01pm)
No. He's saying that, if it had not been cancelled, and construction had continued as scheduled, it still wouldn't be carrying oil until next year. And TransCanada themselves admitted in their filings with the Canadian government that the XL would likely increase prices at the pump in the American Midwest by around $0.15/gallon, due to the removal of oversupply.

Page 20 of this PDF (marked as page 225 in the document numbering): https://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=ubjld


oooooOOOOOoooooo ..........15 cents
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Apr 22 2022 01:05pm
Quote (Defendor @ Apr 22 2022 01:49pm)
So your saying the pipeline would be pumping gas right now if he hadn’t cancelled it… thus making gas cheaper…

He chose higher gas… it’s not me reciting bitchute… it’s the truth he is the one to blame for higher gas prices

Which is why I say

FUCK JOE BIDEN


:rofl:

In what world does "next year at the earliest" mean "today"?
Member
Posts: 46,851
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Apr 22 2022 01:09pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Apr 22 2022 12:05pm)
:rofl:

In what world does "next year at the earliest" mean "today"?


i wonder what biden would say? .......................trunalimunumaprzure :rofl:
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Apr 22 2022 01:20pm
Quote (TiStuff @ Apr 22 2022 02:03pm)
oooooOOOOOoooooo ..........15 cents


Well, considering that pipeline proponents were saying it would lower gas prices at the pump, and the pipeline builder/operator's own application with the Canadian Energy Regulation board stated the exact opposite would occur, it's a significant point.

Actual document filing containing that information in greater context can be found here: https://apps.cer-rec.gc.ca/REGDOCS/Item/View/549220

The document in question is the one titled "B-1f - Supply and Markets (Tab 3) incl. Appendix 3.1 - A1I9R7", and the money quote is on page 7.

Quote
Existing markets for Canadian heavy crude, principally PADD II, are currently oversupplied, resulting in price discounting for Canadian heavy crude oil. Access to the USGC via the Keystone XL Pipeline is expected to strengthen Canadian crude oil pricing in PADD II by removing this oversupply. This is expected to increase the price of heavy crude to the equivalent cost of imported crude. Similarly, if a surplus of light synthetic crude develops in PADD II, the Keystone XL Pipeline would provide an alternate market and therefore help to mitigate a price discount. The resultant increase in the price of heavy crude is estimated to provide an increase in annual revenue to the Canadian producing industry in 2013 of US $2 billion to US $3.9 billion.


This post was edited by Surfpunk on Apr 22 2022 01:25pm
Member
Posts: 46,851
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Apr 22 2022 01:25pm
Quote (Surfpunk @ Apr 22 2022 12:20pm)
Well, considering that pipeline proponents were saying it would lower gas prices at the pump, and the pipeline builder/operator's own application with the Canadian Energy Regulation board stated the exact opposite would occur, it's a significant point.

Actual document filing containing that information in greater context can be found here: https://apps.cer-rec.gc.ca/REGDOCS/Item/View/549220

The document in question is the one titled "B-1f - Supply and Markets (Tab 3) incl. Appendix 3.1 - A1I9R7"


15 cents oooooooOOOooooooo compared to what?
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Apr 22 2022 01:29pm
Quote (TiStuff @ Apr 22 2022 02:25pm)
15 cents oooooooOOOooooooo compared to what?


Compared to a price drop that the people in favor of the pipeline were saying would happen. It means those people were lying through their teeth, when the pipeline owner stated the exact opposite in their application to build it.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1193419351936193719381965Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll