d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Biden Going To War Against Gop Extremism
Prev1181920212229Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 40,852
Joined: Sep 17 2011
Gold: 0.00
Sep 4 2022 01:56am
Quote (YeeHaw @ 3 Sep 2022 23:22)
Sorry you took it personally when he called antifa losers radicals. I mean the whole country knows they are level headed, genuinely good people who just really don’t like Mussolini. His take was unfair.

But in all seriousness bro take a sip of warm milk and calm the fuck down a second. Your “job” wasn’t to listen to him give speeches because if it was you couldn’t argue that what I said is true. Unless you are just lying.


Or you're lying.

Or I actually listened and you didn't.

Or, or, or...

I have listened to hundreds of hours of Trump speeches. Some of it I did live on air.
Member
Posts: 38,137
Joined: May 28 2006
Gold: 0.00
Sep 4 2022 02:02am
Member
Posts: 40,852
Joined: Sep 17 2011
Gold: 0.00
Sep 4 2022 02:19am
Quote (HeLiCaL @ 4 Sep 2022 09:02)


Sad.
Member
Posts: 17,567
Joined: Mar 5 2016
Gold: 27.45
Warn: 40%
Sep 4 2022 02:37am
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Sep 4 2022 09:33am)
Chauvin Arbery and Rittenhouse were all exactly the same in court as what came out beforehand. You must be following some garbage news outlets because we had the first and the last literally on tape.

Also TRUMP HAS ALREADY ADMITTED TO HAVING THE DOCUMENTS AND HANDED OVER SOME OF THEM BEFOREHAND WHILE INTENTIONALLY OBSTRUCTING THE RETRIEVAL OF THE OTHERS. That's how we know he did it. His own words and actions.


everything ok bru ? you seem mad and not wanting to stay long in this sub haha
Member
Posts: 38,137
Joined: May 28 2006
Gold: 0.00
Sep 4 2022 02:41am
Member
Posts: 40,852
Joined: Sep 17 2011
Gold: 0.00
Sep 4 2022 03:39am
Quote (HeLiCaL @ 4 Sep 2022 09:41)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amsK9CUBsO0


LMAO Jimmy Dore.

Holy crap you just love posting the biggest idiots on the internet huh?

Like there are competent right-wing commentators out there. Most of them are still batshit insane but they are at least marginally intelligent. You just seem to pick the absolute dumbest pieces of trash to spam though.
Member
Posts: 3,908
Joined: Jun 20 2022
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Sep 4 2022 03:56am
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Sep 4 2022 02:33am)
Chauvin Arbery and Rittenhouse were all exactly the same in court as what came out beforehand. You must be following some garbage news outlets because we had the first and the last literally on tape.

Also TRUMP HAS ALREADY ADMITTED TO HAVING THE DOCUMENTS AND HANDED OVER SOME OF THEM BEFOREHAND WHILE INTENTIONALLY OBSTRUCTING THE RETRIEVAL OF THE OTHERS. That's how we know he did it. His own words and actions.



Holy shit guy calm your hormones. So in your world, Rittenhouse turned out to be an African hunting white supremacist, as he was portrayed in the media until about two days after the verdict was read and he made it clear he was going to pursue actual malice cases against those who said it. The court case proved he was a white supremacist who went to the riot to hunt him some black’uns. Got it.

In your world Ahmaud Arbery was not on tape stealing from construction sites and the court case proved the McMichaels just wanted to go hunt some black’uns. It in no way, shape, or form came down to a judge refusing to translate Georgia law on lawful citizens arrest and left it to the jury to decide.

Also in your world the Chauven trial focused on how he was a white supremacist cop who just wanted to go out and hunt some black’uns. It didn’t acknowledge how an excess use of force led to an unfortunate death. It definitely didn’t have witnesses on the stand saying everything he did that day was actually well within reason according to the Minneapolis police department protocol.

Got it. You are absolutely delusional.

Meanwhile, here on earth… The Rittenhouse trial proved literally everything (I am not exaggerating. Literally everything) the media said was fabricated. He did not (OMG!!!!!) cross state lines (OMG!!!!!) with a rifle to go hunt blacks. He didn’t kill any blacks. He worked in Wisconsin. His father lives in Kenosha. He was lawfully possessing the rifle. He was providing medical treatment for rioters. He was not the aggressor in any confrontation leading up to gunshots. He acted lawfully in self defense. Everything in this paragraph is a fact proven in court. Everything in this paragraph directly conflicts the media narrative. Your dilutions do not change the facts.

Meanwhile, here on earth… The Arbery case was a disaster of fabrication in itself. There was absolutely zero evidence brought to the jury about the McMichaels intending on hunting some black guy for sport, as the media portrayed. It was a clear cut case of deciding whether they attempted a legal citizens arrest or not. That was it. There was no evidence of racism. There was video evidence of Arbery stealing from construction sites in the neighborhood. The police had asked the neighbors to watch for Arbery, and showed them all the video of him stealing so they knew what he looked like. He returned to the neighborhood as he did several times before, likely to case or steal more things. The McMichaels knew the law allowed them to perform a citizens arrest without witnessing a crime because the crime was a felony. The case came down to ambiguous language in the actual statute explaining how a citizens arrest can be lawful. This is all despite the fact that Arbery, again on video, charged the McMichaels and struggled for their shotgun.

Meanwhile… here on earth… :wacko: The Chauven trial’s prosecution never once accused racial bias. This was a very straightforward case focusing on whether or not he acted in accordance with protocol. Again, witnesses actually testified he did indeed follow correct protocol, and was authorized to use more force than he did. There was zero chance there would have been anything but a guilty verdict given the situation, but the court case was very straightforward.

I am sorry you are unable to cope with reality. Everything I said is a fact. Feel free to watch the court cases. Unfortunately, everybody who says the things you have responds with, “I did watch the court cases and you are just lying.” And to that I repeat, I am sorry you are unable to cope with reality.



Quote (MxVivianWulf @ Sep 4 2022 02:56am)
Or you're lying.

Or I actually listened and you didn't.

Or, or, or...

I have listened to hundreds of hours of Trump speeches. Some of it I did live on air.


And as if on que, here is another user saying I am lying about things that are on video.

And to you, I am not sorry about your inability to deal with reality because you at least claim to be part of an actual terrorist organization. I sincerely wish the worst for you and all of your comrades.
Member
Posts: 49,893
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
Sep 4 2022 04:06am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Sep 4 2022 01:18pm)
It would be fine if everyone was held to the same standard, if the FBI had a track record of mercilessly hounding every single politician who breaks the law, no matter how big or small the crime. But as soon as a significant chunk of the population loses trust in the impartiality of federal law enforcement and the justice system and perceives them to be operating on a double standard, things quickly unravel.

It's like bogie said the other day, dunno if it was in this thread: a president letting his DoJ prosecute his the predecessor (and presumptive rival for power in the upcoming election) based on process crime alone (obstruction), without an indictment for an underlying substantive crime (e.g. the espionage act), would be an unprecedented escalation and extremely corrosive. Going down this path would lay the axe on the fabric of society as well as whatever trust in institutions is left.

And the funny thing is that it would do the GOP a favor - gets rid of Trump without the base turning on the party elites. I consider Trump to be a much more beatable opponent for Harris/Biden in 2024 than a DeSantis backed by a base on maximum tilt.


The person who pushed for the laws that are being aimed at trump right now was donald j trump, are you saying trump should be immune to laws he passed himself?
Member
Posts: 38,137
Joined: May 28 2006
Gold: 0.00
Sep 4 2022 04:35am
Quote (MxVivianWulf @ Sep 4 2022 12:39pm)
LMAO Jimmy Dore.

Holy crap you just love posting the biggest idiots on the internet huh?

Like there are competent right-wing commentators out there. Most of them are still batshit insane but they are at least marginally intelligent. You just seem to pick the absolute dumbest pieces of trash to spam though.


open genocidal commie + identitarian calling someone else an idiot LOL





This post was edited by HeLiCaL on Sep 4 2022 04:37am
Member
Posts: 27,048
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
Sep 4 2022 09:04am
Quote (HeLiCaL @ Sep 4 2022 01:02am)



Lol you really need therapy. You might be the closest to McVeigh in here and there’s a few
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1181920212229Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll