continuously monitored .. by people who have convinced me that they have a vested interest in having consumers be unhealthy so that those consumers will need more health care services.

If the drug companies had convinced me that they were working for my health (instead of against it) then this whole conversation would be different.

I only consume health care services when I have no other choice (because the condition is so painful that it warrants the risk of taking a pill).

This post was edited by Kayeto on Jun 22 2021 02:55am

Vaccines are generally safe for kids but they are specifically studied in children before they are released to the wider public for use in children just to be sure.

Right, usually they shut down trials after about 100 deaths. At the moment , just in the US, it's at about 5k deaths and multiple sources at the CDC/VAERS/v safe saying it's massively underreported. There is more adverse effects and deaths than dozens of the previous vaccines combined.

Let's not forget media is telling us the truth

You don't know enough to have a respectable opinion if you think drug companies are the last word on monitoring their own products.

The FDA will shut their shit down in a second if there is even a hint of a safety risk that exceeds the risk of Covid infection, which is why they shut down Johnson and Johnson after 6 adverse reactions.

I'm sorry dude, but you need to do some basic research on the process, because you're spreading easily debunked nonsense.

There are places where we should be suspicious of pharmaceutical companies, but it's mostly in the sales department, not in places that are adequately regulated and monitored by the FDA.

How did the FDA prevent the drug companies from creating the opioid epidemic?

If it wasn't for the smoking gun of the opioid crisis, I'd probably trust the FDA.

This post was edited by Kayeto on Jun 22 2021 03:03am

Bullshit. No flat number of deaths can determine when a trial is shut down. It will depend on the number of participants and the disease risk it is being weighed against.

Mass deployment is not a trial. We are beyond trials and into continual monitoring of the public. Even if we assume that 5k deaths are all caused by the vaccines, that's like two days of Covid deaths before vaccines were deployed. It's about weighing risk vs reward. Vaccines are orders of magnitude less risky than rampant Covid spread.

Any reason you're being blatantly dishonest? We've been over this already. The FDA has not been empowered to regulate how pharmaceutical companies market their drugs. They have been empowered to monitor safety and efficacy.

lol call me dodging after I have provided two sources that the definition was changed to accommodate mRNA experimental jab weaseling your way around. Any one else reading here go and find out how freaky fraud bill gates and dr fraudie jabs faired in the animal trials.
-----------------------------------------------
this total clowN show people jumping into jap chair in fear and TDS
"The FDA Will Do a Good Job of That" - Bill Gates
https://www.bitchute.com/video/KJqlrEl0nNxr/

what do you need to know its freaky stuff?

This post was edited by TiStuff on Jun 22 2021 03:27am

Safe, but not recommended.
Not recommended while pushed on kids.

Alright

I'm not watching a video and doing your homework. Type the definition you are using so there is no misunderstanding.