Quote (thesnipa @ Jan 23 2020 03:05pm)
this investigation is following the exact precedent, minus the independent investigator. and im sure if they followed that path you'd say they're dragging it out and/or you would say the investigator is too biased.
Quote (thesnipa @ Jan 23 2020 03:38pm)
You're just narrowing your focus to avoid the hard truth tbh.
the simple fact is the dems in 2020 are playing it as dirty and its as political as the GOP played it against clinton. many of of the same GOP slobs crying now were literally there.
you can point to minute differences between two investigations 20 some odd years apart against 2 different people for 2 different crimes tho, if it makes you feel like the above simple truth doesnt matter. i tend to lean towards simple truths, rather than complicated apologetics. the whole "but but but did they do this exact thing exactly like this" bullshit is just giving Lindsay Graham a boner, it certainly doesnt change anything here in pard.
Quote (thesnipa @ Jan 23 2020 03:38pm)
You're just narrowing your focus to avoid the hard truth tbh.
the simple fact is the dems in 2020 are playing it as dirty and its as political as the GOP played it against clinton. many of of the same GOP slobs crying now were literally there.
you can point to minute differences between two investigations 20 some odd years apart against 2 different people for 2 different crimes tho, if it makes you feel like the above simple truth doesnt matter. i tend to lean towards simple truths, rather than complicated apologetics. the whole "but but but did they do this exact thing exactly like this" bullshit is just giving Lindsay Graham a boner, it certainly doesnt change anything here in pard.
Quote (thesnipa @ Jan 23 2020 03:56pm)
ummm buddy..... Bill Clinton committed crimes during the investigation, which was started because the GOP didnt like him getting a blowjob.
if you dont understand the gravity of the above bolded i cant help you. just get it man.
Quote (thesnipa @ Jan 23 2020 04:10pm)
I see you're intent to use on using semantic differences between the two to avoid addressing simple truths.
have a nice month. im not going to take you for a walk every time you say something that's historic revision just so you can go on pretending your side are angels. your bias is thicker than a rhyno hide, i'll just let you go up against people who are into one sided ping pong.
all you can tell me is that this is political, in which i agreed.
you are unable to tell me how this follows precedent.
instead, you take cheap shots at me in nearly every post. a month is too soon buddy