Quote (bogie160 @ 25 Jul 2019 23:16)
He was then forced to walk it back, as the report explicitly said that wasn't the case.
wrong, he did what he already explained countless times during this whole probe, and what the hacks and the propaganda victims both misinterpret as 'proof positive of trump's innocence': he went with his 'that's
not the correct way to SAY it, insisting that he personally
did not draw a conclusion concerning crime or not in the report (again, he already explained multiple times
that would seem like an indictment without indicting, and he
thinks he's not allowed to do that due to the controversial OLC rule).
notice how
he did NOT walk back the confirmation of trump fulfilling all three parts necessary for obstruction. so what republican hacks are spinning as 'walkback' of one of the most damning and obviously threatening parts to their narrative, is really just mueller getting back on message about his role, realising how putting all his findings in context can only lead to one logical conclusion.
it's so funny how you people immediately went to the official republican narrative without even questioning it. someone playing strictly by the rules, like mueller, apparently makes you completely blind to the nuances and logical conclusions of what they are saying. when they don't blurt it out in braindead, unsophisticated slogans at rallies, you don't really understand it, do you?
i mean it's not like the cases actually described in detail in part 2 of the report leave any doubt about trump's guilt - at least if you actually looked into it and didn't copy paste your 'opinion' directly from fox 'news'...