d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Official Political Censorship Thread
Prev11819202122124Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 49,894
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
Oct 17 2018 06:54pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Oct 18 2018 11:30am)
https://www.kansascity.com/news/politics-government/election/article220193095.html

here's a fun joke
After 2 years of listening to the left scream about how the media's victimization complex and insistence that Trump is an authoritarian tyrant censoring the free press and failing to protect journalists- the same week as the Saudi's dicing a journalist into small cubes- Claire McCaskill's campaign has responded to the Project Veritas secret video footage that exposed her lying about her political positions... by demanding the Attorney General for Missouri lock up the journalists.
>U.S. Sen. Claire McCaskill’s campaign is demanding Attorney General Josh Hawley open a fraud investigation into hidden-camera videos released this week by a nonprofit run by conservative activist James O’Keefe.
>The videos show O’Keefe’s Project Veritas Action Fund going undercover to secretly interview members of McCaskill’s campaign. The group, a 501c4 nonprofit, advertised the videos as proof that McCaskill, a Democrat, has been hiding her views on guns and abortion from Missouri voters.

Of course its completely absurd from a legal standpoint on multiple grounds. Even if the MMPA was applicable, it would a violation of the 1st amendment to use it to censor journalists. But the MMPA isn't applicable, because that governs only commercial merchandising with an ascertainable lost value of money or property due to fraud. Its right there in the four-pronged test for MMPA relief;
https://bell-law-kc.com/8-things-you-need-to-know-about-the-missouri-merchandising-practices-act/

So Claire McCaskill's campaign is unironically calling for locking up journalists because they ran a sting hit piece on her. She's demanding a special prosecutor to lock up her political opponents based on an infinitely stretched reinterpretation of already vague statutes, in a manner that's not even consistent with the statute anyway let alone constitutional.


Veritas belong In jail.
Dunno how they can be considered journalists after the times they have been caught for fraud.

This post was edited by Plaguefear on Oct 17 2018 06:55pm
Member
Posts: 33,927
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Oct 17 2018 07:20pm
Quote (Plaguefear @ Oct 17 2018 08:54pm)
Veritas belong In jail.
Dunno how they can be considered journalists after the times they have been caught for fraud.


Unlike you losers we have a first amendment because we know the truth matters
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Oct 17 2018 07:21pm
:rofl:

What is this? The sixth time we'll point out that Veritas was definitely deceptively editing videos and have their entire existence?

Quote (EndlessSky @ Oct 17 2018 07:20pm)
Unlike you losers we have a first amendment because we know the truth matters


Anybody who thinks the truth matters won't defend Project Veritas.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Oct 17 2018 07:21pm
Member
Posts: 50,903
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,836.00
Oct 17 2018 08:12pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Oct 17 2018 07:21pm)
Anybody who thinks the truth matters won't defend Project Veritas.


Anyone who thinks the 1st amendment matters will defend Project Veritas, CNN and RT alike.
Member
Posts: 49,894
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
Oct 17 2018 08:19pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ Oct 18 2018 12:20pm)
Unlike you losers we have a first amendment because we know the truth matters


The truth? These guys lie for a living.
And Republicans on this forum hate the first amendment, you prove it all the time.

This post was edited by Plaguefear on Oct 17 2018 08:19pm
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Oct 17 2018 08:19pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Oct 17 2018 08:12pm)
Anyone who thinks the 1st amendment matters will defend Project Veritas, CNN and RT alike.


There are limits on all rights. For instance O'Keefe was fined $100,000 for the ACORN scandal. He was going to get similar charges for the Planned Parenthood video but struck a deal including the release of the full unedited video.

Anybody who defends Project Veritas is 1) Dishonest 2) Ignorant 3) Stupid, or any combination of the three.

I'd stick around to argue with you, but at this point anybody who still trusts Veritas is, at minimum, a 3.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Oct 17 2018 08:19pm
Member
Posts: 38,137
Joined: May 28 2006
Gold: 0.00
Oct 17 2018 08:32pm
Quote (Plaguefear @ Oct 18 2018 04:19am)
The truth? These guys lie for a living.
And Republicans on this forum hate the first amendment, you prove it all the time.


right now you are shaming those who you think is lying, but youre calling the exact same thing, when done by republicans, as "hate of the first amendment"

feel dumb yet?

This post was edited by HeLiCaL on Oct 17 2018 08:33pm
Member
Posts: 49,894
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
Oct 17 2018 08:38pm
Quote (HeLiCaL @ Oct 18 2018 01:32pm)
right now you are shaming those who you think is lying, but youre calling the exact same thing, when done by republicans, as "hate of the first amendment"

feel dumb yet?


That made no sense at all.
Member
Posts: 33,927
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Oct 17 2018 08:42pm
Quote (Plaguefear @ Oct 17 2018 10:19pm)
The truth? These guys lie for a living.
And Republicans on this forum hate the first amendment, you prove it all the time.


Its a miracle you can even breathe
Member
Posts: 38,137
Joined: May 28 2006
Gold: 0.00
Oct 17 2018 08:43pm
Quote (Plaguefear @ Oct 18 2018 04:38am)
That made no sense at all.


post the examples or "republicans showing hate for first amendment" here, it will clear things up
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev11819202122124Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll