d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Wtf Is It With People And Their Dogs?
Prev11819202122Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 32,985
Joined: Mar 17 2005
Gold: 6.00
Apr 5 2011 01:34am
Quote (Everclear190 @ Apr 5 2011 02:28am)
Yeah, I had a dog that was siberian husky/malamute/black lab mix. She was sweet as sugar but a nightmare to control. She absolutely had to greet everybody, and it would often freak people out if I had her unleashed at a park. Took me prolly 10 months to train her to obey my commands without question.


thats the way my hound is. hes so energetic and i wanna let him get out and run it off but at the same time he will want to go sniff everyone and every dog he sees if i let him loose. when hes not in the house or on a leash i have to leave him a tether lol. he likes getting into that mode where hes nose to the ground barking and running lol
Member
Posts: 28,331
Joined: Jun 9 2007
Gold: 11,700.00
Apr 5 2011 01:43am
Quote (Psycho- @ 5 Apr 2011 06:59)
you just keep showing your ignorance about dogs. you are blaming the dog for every attack and aren't even touching the fact that most attacks are because of the person not the dog. dogs don't "just attack" no matter how much you want to believe.
you are also failing to realize that they are not banned on any merit other than the ignorant public such a yourself.
you find me some factual evidence that says pitbulls are born with a more aggressive nature and come back.


you certainly do and you clearly have difficulty reading
where did i say that i blame the dog for every attack? seems you can only think in black and white
not going to start to explain why i know more about dogs than you because you are clearly not capable to understand what i say
but just a hint: try reading up on the history of dog breeds and perhaps a tiny little light will come up

Quote (Arsenic_Touch @ 5 Apr 2011 07:05)


did i say "no case"? you don't understand the word "nearly"? do i need to explain it to you?

This post was edited by brmv on Apr 5 2011 01:44am
Member
Posts: 32,985
Joined: Mar 17 2005
Gold: 6.00
Apr 5 2011 01:48am
Quote (brmv @ Apr 5 2011 02:43am)
you certainly do and you clearly have difficulty reading
where did i say that i blame the dog for every attack? seems you can only think in black and white
not going to start to explain why i know more about dogs than you because you are clearly not capable to understand what i say
but just a hint: try reading up on the history of dog breeds and perhaps a tiny little light will come up



did i say "no case"? you don't understand the word "nearly"? do i need to explain it to you?


lmfao you are still trying your bullshit that "breeding for x purpose means they are only capable of x purpose".

its breeding developed its physique not its mentality.
Member
Posts: 28,331
Joined: Jun 9 2007
Gold: 11,700.00
Apr 5 2011 01:57am
Quote (Psycho- @ 5 Apr 2011 07:48)
lmfao you are still trying your bullshit that "breeding for x purpose means they are only capable of x purpose".
its breeding developed its physique not its mentality.


no, unlike you i do not think in black and white only
and you are wrong
dogs are not only bred for physique but also for disposition
you might educate yourself by reading up on breed standards
while they have a long list of physical characteristics
character and disposition are essential criteria for a pure bred dog
Member
Posts: 55,374
Joined: Mar 6 2006
Gold: 220.48
Apr 5 2011 01:58am
Quote (brmv @ Apr 5 2011 03:43am)
did i say "no case"? you don't understand the word "nearly"? do i need to explain it to you?


Did I say "funny"? you don't understand the word "funny"? do i need to explain it to you?

By the way it's clear that you do not know more about dogs when you cite biased material as your evidence. So stop pretending that you do.

This post was edited by Arsenic_Touch on Apr 5 2011 02:00am
Member
Posts: 28,331
Joined: Jun 9 2007
Gold: 11,700.00
Apr 5 2011 02:01am
Quote (Arsenic_Touch @ 5 Apr 2011 07:58)
Did I say "funny"? you don't understand the word "funny"? do i need to explain it to you?
By the way it's clear that you do not know more about dogs when you cite biased material as your evidence. So stop pretending that you do.


mirror
Member
Posts: 32,985
Joined: Mar 17 2005
Gold: 6.00
Apr 5 2011 02:04am
Quote (brmv @ Apr 5 2011 02:57am)
no, unlike you i do not think in black and white only
and you are wrong
dogs are not only bred for physique but also for disposition
you might educate yourself by reading up on breed standards
while they have a long list of physical characteristics
character and disposition are essential criteria for a pure bred dog


list of UKC breed standards for the american pitbull. only thing it says is a general statement of aggression is dog on dog aggression.

http://www.ukcdogs.com/WebSite.nsf/Breeds/AmericanPitBullTerrierRevisedNovember12008

This post was edited by Psycho- on Apr 5 2011 02:09am
Member
Posts: 57,983
Joined: Jan 12 2006
Gold: 5,104.00
Apr 5 2011 02:39am
Quote (Arsenic_Touch @ 5 Apr 2011 09:15)
The viciousness of the breed? they are no more vicious than any other dog. Any dog and I do mean any dog, improperly trained and abused can turn into a killer.

City of Huntsville v. Tack, et al., Alabama Supreme Court(2002). The Supreme Court of Alabama affirmed the decision of the lower state court that pit bulls are not inherently dangerous
Zuniga v. County of San Mateo Department of Health Services, the California Court of Appeals held that pit bulls are not inherently dangerous. (1990)

Tellings v. City of Toledo (2004), the Court found that there is no statistical evidence which indicates that the pit bull bites more frequently than some other breeds of dogs.


From what i know, pitbulls are cross-breeded to be killers. They are fight-dogs.
For as long as there have been herd dogs out there, they usually came from a certain breed. I haven`t seen a pitbull or a boxer used for that. There are sledge dogs, the huskies etc. Again, no pitbulls Each breed has its characteristics. Do pitbulls have playfulness ? I missed on that, if so, i humbly appologise.

This post was edited by B4al on Apr 5 2011 03:04am
Banned
Posts: 726
Joined: Mar 9 2011
Gold: 50.01
Apr 5 2011 02:46am
Quote (B4al @ Apr 5 2011 03:39am)
From what i know, pitbulls are cross-breeded to be killers. They are fight-dogs.
For as long as there have been herd dogs out there, they usually came from a certain breed. I haven`t seen a pitbull or a boxer used for that. There are sledge dogs, the huskies etc. Again, no pitbulls Each breed has its characteristics. Do pitbulls have playfulness ? I missed on that, if so, i humbly appologise.


Fighting dogs are often pitbulls, but the breed itself is not an aggressive breed. What makes them awesome fight dogs is their extremely power necks, potentially the strongest neck of any dog. This allows them to bite down and rip flesh, even though their jaws don't have a lot of power, the sheer speed and power their necks can exhibit can cause even a weak bite to inflict serious harm.

edit: Pitbulls are not a very smart breed of dog, meaning they are very easy to train and they are very impressionable. If you treat them like shit, they will be mean dogs, but if you treat them nicely, they will be nice.

Smarter breeds of dogs like your huskies and malamutes are generally friendly towards humans regardless of how you treat them, but are extremely hard to train and can become violent if they become dominant. (they retain more wolf instinct than most breeds, especially malamutes.)

This post was edited by Everclear190 on Apr 5 2011 02:50am
Member
Posts: 32,985
Joined: Mar 17 2005
Gold: 6.00
Apr 5 2011 02:49am
Quote (B4al @ Apr 5 2011 03:39am)
From what i know, pitbulls are cross-breeded to be killers. They are fight-dogs.
For as long as there have been herd dogs out there, they usually came from a certain breed. I haven`t seen a pitbull or a boxer used for that. There are sledge dogs, the huskies etc. Again, no pitbulls Each breed has its characteristics. Do pitbulls have playfulness ? I missed on that, if so, i humbly appologise.


they weren't bread to be fighters they were bread to be what they are...strong and athletic and good looking. people used them for fighting because of their athleticism and strength not because of their aggressive nature. this is just another one of those things that circulate that makes the dog look bad instead of the assholes training them to fight other dogs/animals for amusement.

edit: ha beat me to it.

This post was edited by Psycho- on Apr 5 2011 02:50am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev11819202122Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll