d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Gay Marriage > In The Us Nationallly
Prev1181920212251Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 78,723
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 493.00
Dec 22 2009 09:21pm
Quote (axshen @ Dec 23 2009 03:16am)
Why should people be rewarded for having children?  When resources are a concern and the population is quickly growing I doubt we should be encouraging people to have children.  Also, if global warming is a threat the best way to slow it down would be to encourage people NOT to have children.


:headscratch:

that's going to take a long time to answer, better to just look it up O_o
Member
Posts: 96,125
Joined: Mar 15 2007
Gold: 7,252.72
Dec 22 2009 09:22pm
Quote (Kamikizzle @ Dec 22 2009 10:14pm)
what i meant to ask was what is the distinction from agreed morality and individual morality. if i think its is moral to let gays marry, yet you think its immoral then we obviously do not have "agreed" morality. so what is the distinction between agreed morality, and someones morality, since society as a whole will never be "agreed"


Agreed upon morality is the prevailing morality of the majority . It neither needs nor demands total inclusion by its definition .
Member
Posts: 9,899
Joined: May 7 2006
Gold: 550.00
Dec 22 2009 09:24pm
Quote (WidowMaKer_MK @ Dec 22 2009 10:22pm)
Agreed upon morality is the prevailing morality of the majority . It neither needs nor demands total inclusion by its definition .


So if everyone in America agreed that blacks were inferior, it would be okay to make them our slaves again?

Sounds suspiciously like subjective morality. Something you have repeatedly said would lead to the downfall of humanity.
Member
Posts: 96,125
Joined: Mar 15 2007
Gold: 7,252.72
Dec 22 2009 09:24pm
Quote (axshen @ Dec 22 2009 10:08pm)
Ya it's moral to prevent two people who love each other from adopting children that they'll love equally as much.

Let's take a look at neo-conservatism:

1. You don't like abortion.
2. You don't want gay people WHO CANNOT PHYSICALLY HAVE CHILDREN to be able to adopt.

What do you propose we do to all of these kids who would give anything to have a stable family?  A bigger point, if these gay people were born this way then wouldn't you say it was god's will?



If society does not want it all your rhetorical assumptions accomplish nothing .

Pissing into the wind only gets your shoes wet .

This post was edited by WidowMaKer_MK on Dec 22 2009 09:25pm
Member
Posts: 33,701
Joined: Jul 17 2006
Gold: 1,990.00
Dec 22 2009 09:24pm
Quote (WidowMaKer_MK @ Dec 22 2009 07:22pm)
Agreed upon morality is the prevailing morality of the majority . It neither needs nor demands total inclusion by its definition .


so how is agreed morality measured, or determined? is it simply the voice of the majority?
Member
Posts: 6,031
Joined: Jul 15 2008
Gold: 57.92
Dec 22 2009 09:25pm
Quote (WidowMaKer_MK @ Dec 22 2009 10:24pm)
If society does not want it all your rhetorical assumptions accomplish nothing .

Pissing into the wind onlt gets your shoes wet .


Better not make an argument or anything. People might see you as something other than a religious lunatic.
Member
Posts: 96,125
Joined: Mar 15 2007
Gold: 7,252.72
Dec 22 2009 09:26pm
Quote (Kamikizzle @ Dec 22 2009 10:24pm)
so how is agreed morality measured, or determined? is it simply the voice of the majority?


Exactly !

Now your cooking with gas my friend . B)
Member
Posts: 78,723
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 493.00
Dec 22 2009 09:26pm
Quote (WidowMaKer_MK @ Dec 23 2009 03:22am)
Agreed upon morality is the prevailing morality of the majority . It neither needs nor demands total inclusion by its definition .


democratic vote = morality :evil:
Member
Posts: 96,125
Joined: Mar 15 2007
Gold: 7,252.72
Dec 22 2009 09:27pm
Quote (axshen @ Dec 22 2009 10:25pm)
Better not make an argument or anything.  People might see you as something other than a religious lunatic.


I couldn't give a rats ass for what anyone sees me as .

I am not here to win Miss Congeniality , I am here to present reality to next generation .
Member
Posts: 33,701
Joined: Jul 17 2006
Gold: 1,990.00
Dec 22 2009 09:28pm
Quote (WidowMaKer_MK @ Dec 22 2009 07:26pm)
Exactly !

Now your cooking with gas my friend .  B)


so in america there exists no examples of when the legislators, or arbiters of the law have overridden the voice of the majority?
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1181920212251Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll