because he always escapes his handlers and twitters freely eventually. not really a mystery which of his tweets are made by political strategists, and which are just his unfiltered opinion...

why is the lying fake news media spinning my every word?


seriously, Trump should just have stayed out of this entirely. with his.. uh... "interesting" past and reputation when it comes to women, he's just a toxic figure in the GOP fight to get Kav confirmed. he shouldnt have said a word, not even issued a generic statement.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Sep 26 2018 02:39pm

This whole #metoo thing, is setting a dangerous precedent. We are allowing women to destroy men's careers with zero proof. I don't even think Weinstein's should have been allowed.

You are on the record defending Roy Moore and Weinstein

just lol

Them too. There was NO PROOF.

If a married couple with kids gets divorced, the man has to fight for his life to get/see the kids, and/or to not have to pay for child support etc. Now this.
I think we need to go back to bonking the woman over the head and dragging her home, caveman style days.

Cosby was a hypocritical conservative so you should add that convicted sexual predator to your list too since he might appeal

He was tried in a court of law and found guilty. Big difference with this crap going on right now.

I knew the black held more weight than the conservative

funny how his conviction counts

Another character witness has come forward:

https://100percentfedup.com/breaking-man-who-grew-up-with-julie-swetnicks-family-says-she-is-delusional-whack-job-who-had-substance-abuse-and-mental-health-issues/
https://wrko.iheart.com/alternate/amp/2018-09-26-family-friend-of-julie-swetnick-details-her-issues/
https://www.iheart.com/podcast/658-The-Kuhner-Report-28754718/episode/family-friend-says-julie-swetnick-had-29906851/



of course, that too could be a hoax. But unlike the accusers, he provides specific details.
knows her parents name, where she grew up, the street, father is school administrator.
knows where her mother worked and her job, knows when they passed away, knows his PHD at NYU and work on manhattan project

that's a whole TON of verifiable details that corroborate his story. See how that works? He told a story, and it was loaded with oodles of specifics, and people can verify them

This post was edited by Goomshill on Sep 26 2018 02:54pm

Yes, it's treacherous grounds for Republicans for all the reasons you mentioned. This is part of the reason why the Senate Judicial Committee hired an outside female prosecutor to question Kavanaugh and Ford tomorrow. They know the optics of 11 Republican men grilling Ford would look awful.

As far as Kavanaugh withdrawing, I think it could be the best thing for the Republican party politically. But depending on the hearing tomorrow and what other corrobating evidence does or does not come out in the coming days, it could also set a horrible precedent. And if all 3 claims are untrue, it's also deeply unfair to Kavanaugh.

If you're Chuck Grassley, and you have good reason to believe that there isn't enough evidence or corroboration to these claims about Kavanaugh, can you really look a fully qualified nominee who is giving you their honest word in the face and tell him to withdraw?

I get it's all politics, but I don't think Grassley is going to do that - unless tomorrow's testimony goes south for Kavanaugh/GOP or additional evidence comes out for some of these allegations.



Most of the time Trump says exactly what he's thinking...which is both foolish and admirable from an honesty perspective.