i don't know how that's even remotely relevant for my point that throughout this whole thread you have consistently attacked and complained about actions that democrats hadn't even taken, while largely ignoring the hackery, hypocrisy, and lack of morals actually on display from the right, but if i had to place a bet right now i'd probably say 'no' - just based on the way you're asking. prior to this post i probably would have leaned toward 'yes', but with serious doubts based on his awful legislative track record in conflict to the positions you allegedly hold.

i'm sure that will probably make you think you dodged another 'gotcha' (or even worse, is a setup for the nonsensical 'can't be biased because i don't even want him confirmed' argument), or some other paranoid bs that's apparently going on in your head, but again - that has literally nothing to do with my point. also, it's basically the same kind of 'logic' as with the pro-abortion stance i openly asked you about, and that you hilariously misidentified as 'trap' (even though i did everything to convey to you that your clear bias on this issue is what made me curious in the first place), and that you evaded only thanks to your outstanding intelligence and perceptiveness, haha...

wouldn't her sexual history only matter if we could credibly believe she willingly participated in a gang bang then called it rape?

not trying to slutshame-shame but it just seems like an unrelated point to her credibility, even though her allegations are sexual in nature. the sleeping around and being called a "whore" isn't relevant to a gang rape imo. i'd object to that if it was in discover, i'd try to strike all of the reviews that didn't talk about her lying or defamation.



did you read post #1816?

based on this non-yes-no-answer id have to guess not.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Sep 26 2018 02:07pm

Oh I was just playing the optimistic democrat that day. Today is for realism. The dude is going to get confirmed. Why wouldn't he? Something really crazy is going to have to happen tomorrow for his fate to be anything other than a life of power and luxury.

I bet she was pretty hot in the 80's

Why not? It's a disgusting logical fallacy that needs to be called out every time someone attempts it.

the nature of the allegations are sexual, so her sexual history/credibility may be relevant. id give myself a 50-50 of getting it tossed in discovery. female judge tho, 90-10.

I'm going to need to see a list of all of Brett Kavanaugh's past sexual partners.

I think the bolded part carries a lot more weight than some online dating reviews. It would be nice to know if the defamation lawsuits against her were successful - if yes, then that's a huge, court-proof evidence against her being a credible source.



definitely. I think she's still quite beautiful for a woman in her 50s. But there's just something horribly off about her smile.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Sep 26 2018 02:11pm

well he claims to be a virgin till like 25. so you'll prob get a list with 2-3 women and his wife.



if by "court-proof" you mean would likely sway a jury, yes. i dont think it would prevent it from being admissible tho.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Sep 26 2018 02:11pm

I don't think the posts calling her a whore are as relevant as the ones calling her a liar and establishing a predisposition to unethical conduct like banging married men.
Its kind of like you say, if she was a whore than it would play to her credibility of whether she consented to a sexual encounter and retroactively called it gang rape. But that's mooted by Kavanaugh's flat denial that anything of the sort happened at all, and our total lack of evidence ever putting the two of them within a mile of each other. Given Kavanaugh's total denial, it would be enough just to establish he was banging her that it wouldn't matter whether she consented or not insofar as proving Kavanaugh at least a liar.

but multiple personal accusations of her lying and a defamation suit? If all you've got for an accusation is personal credibility, and your accuser has a reputation as a liar and is being represented by the creepy porn lawyer, yeesh