And close your mind to everything else.

False, there are multiple hypothesis. You can begin your journey of scientific enlightenment here. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis

Wikipedia is generally a terrible source but if you ignore the article and go straight to the source material you will see how wrong you are.

Wait your turn wasn't talking to you.

Don't reject the Holy Spirit

I guess you're smarter than all the world leading scientists I studied with in grad school lmao

Did you even read that article? There are no mechanistic hypotheses for the formation of cells or any sort of self-replicating biomolecules because that shit is more complicated than anything ever deduced in history. "It could totally have been catalyzed by geothermal vents and stardust bro" is not a hypothesis

This post was edited by El1te on Jul 17 2023 09:47pm

'zeus, your best argument



assertion fallacy. the grandest of vastet argumets.well...............except for 'zues

superior intellect creating life is bullchit idea
-vastet

vastet explains abiogenesis

You aren't studying with world leading scientists if you think abiogenesis isn't a solid hypothesis. You're studying crackpots or people who aren't actually in the field they're commenting on.
Also I did advise you not to read the article and go to the source material. Article's on Wikipedia are almost always useless even when not referring to a valid hypothesis that is disputed by masses of ignorant people.

Repetition of a blatant lie, this is what you can expect from any random theist when they realize they lost and have nowhere else to go.




Strawman fallacy.



Magic sky daddy creating life is bullshit.
~Vastet