Voter turnout is the answer for those of us who live in reality.

Deplorable turnout*

no one expects you to have a memory nor be credible about what happened.

if you were worth more around here i might spend the time linking a debate video with timestamps. the democratic primary was actually really policy driven compared to the GOP and hillary and bernie had a lot of differences.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Apr 20 2018 03:30pm

Ya hillary wanted to sellout america while bernie only wanted to sellout the millenials

This post was edited by tonerbond on Apr 20 2018 03:31pm

Maybe in your world.
This is the same person who loses, writes a book about why she lost, and pretty much gets laughed out of the book set also.

She had nothing in 2016, and still has nothing.

bernie was more isolationist, wanted obamacare gone day 1, had free college rather than cheap college in mind originally, had harder tax cuts for wallstreet, bernie was harder on campaign finance reform, bernies was more specific in his CJ reform policies but was more focussed on police with less focus on prison's (cops are the mechanism filling it) and less focused on courts (cops are the ones referring them) it was a lot more simplistic and therefore easier to detail.

the idea that HRC was without platform just because she was the status quo candidate is silly. its not even true that she didn't talk about policy, its just not as memorable.

i honestly think people have bad memories and the 12 hour revolving news cycle isnt helping.



and that book has nothing to do with a lack or presence of a platform. you bringing it up shows how incapable of critical thought you are

This post was edited by thesnipa on Apr 20 2018 03:35pm

You standing up for Hillary after the fact, trying to rewrite history, after the fact is just sad.


This was Hillary's whole platform...

Pokemon go to the doctor

im not standing up for hillary, i disliked her platform nearly top to bottom, and didnt support her. i'm just being objective about what words mean and how they apply correctly in sentences.

you mean like you're rewriting history in saying a general election candidate for POTUS didn't have a platform. trump had a lot of stuff in his platform that didnt get addressed on the debate stage either, the fact that all they wanted to use was mud doesn't mean they didnt have a platform to back it. you realize they had like whole official websites with policies laid out for what they'd do if elected, right?

it's sad that HRC lost with a more comprehensive platform than trump with 30 years more experience. that makes it more sad, not less sad. your faulty memory would be said if it didnt find the idea of you having early onset dementia or Alzheimer's so god damn funny.

America was tired of establishment candidates that had essentially trained their whole life in deception

It would be like a mom and pop business owner wanting to be friends with a career lawyer