yeah i was like oh shit did the judge go ham again lol

No, not in that question. He is asking why he didnt leave it on the street corner or with someone else on that street corner before running off.

Is the prosecution dropping a bombshell or is this work up a flat fucking nothing burger.



Edit : Uh oh...
Is this something we haven't seen before?


Oh no kyle oh noo boy

This post was edited by lolkggz on Nov 10 2021 02:52pm

He's PRAYING kyle gets worked up and says something stupid. so far no good.

also it usually doesnt work unless you're playing nice guy, when ur an ass people are guarded.

this prosecutor just isnt a good lawyer. he's a guy who gets plea deals and doesnt have sharp tools. thats what happens in a massively minority place like Kenosha, his best bud is the lead for public defenders office i bet and they prob golf each sunday just to laugh at innocent people who signed plea deals.

"No, you can't use Apple's AI to create something new that didn't actually happen and claim it as evidence."

Good job defense on objecting.

Edit: Holy fucking shit. He's actively lying about what the AI does. He claims it's just like a magnifying glass?

At what point does this guy get charged for actively lying directly to the judge? Contempt is a real thing.

This post was edited by InsaneBobb on Nov 10 2021 02:55pm

Rittenhouse should be convicted for not setting his rifle down in the middle of the street and walking away

I'm gonna have to say zooming in on a video is fine, this is one of the things I kinda have to agree with the prosecution on.
What he's gonna show, is unknown

The defense attorney is talking about the 3d AI creation (because it's a video). The simple 2d zoom in and pinch feature just zooms in.

This is false. It fills in mixing pixels. That's altering the actual image. It is NOT a magnifying glass.