Quote (Beowulf @ Sep 26 2018 09:25am)
Currently to me it falls in with the other allegations some of it doesn't quite make much sense given other information of the case
we have one saying never happened, 40 year old virgin which may be true but doesn't do much as I'm not sure he has actually been accused of rape himself yet unless I missed a detail it appears he's some sort of gang rape cuck apprentice in the allegations post gang rape accusation?
this has all been quite escalated so at this time I'm not sure how there could be so many holes in the stories because now the stories paint quite an extreme environment that there should be way more evidence and witnesses of
The stories are so wildly inconsistent, completely lacking in evidence and run into walls of denials from contemporaries and can't even pinpoint specifics or get it down to a year-
that frankly, the only plausible explanation is that these are a form of collective hysteria / self delusion / blatant lying.
We've watched a lot of sex assault allegations and denials over the past year and well before that, and
never has there ever been a case where multiple accusers come forward but
nobody has even a single shred of evidence. That's unbelievable. In every other case, when the guy was actually guilty of something, accusers would come forward and we've be buried in specifics and evidence that quickly made it undeniable. But so far we have 3 sets of allegations that paint an absurdly inconsistent picture of the man. He's a serial gang rapist who runs trains on women with his frat boy friends after drugging them with quaaludes and thereby one of the biggest sexual predators in his campus's history- yet he's also supposed to have been so inept and drunkenly clumsy that all he did to ford was grope her before tumbling off?
all they need is one or two actual pieces of evidence. Even just having details that they were even at a party that they can show actually occurred at a minimum.
This post was edited by Goomshill on Sep 26 2018 09:34am