Sleep well, King.

Marketing and advertising? So their product worked, but they didn't advertise it appropriately. Not exactly something that matters in this context.

Moderna had stainless steel particles in their vial. Pretty obviously got there from the manufacturing of the containers, so calling it "contamination" without the context is emotionally loaded. There's also only been 3 deaths so far none of which has been linked to the vaccine (and they won't be, since stainless steel particles aren't going to kill you), which still puts the risk/reward profile overwhelmingly on the side of the vaccine.



If you eat anything other than totally raw food you are already a test subject.

This post was edited by NetflixAdaptationWidow on Sep 8 2021 01:36am

Perhaps you didn't read the articles about the incident. "Contamination" was used on various sources describing the contents of those 1.6 million vaccines in Japan. More than likely, tons were contaminated here too but it was covered up. Regarding Pfizer, please read what I mentioned instead of blowing it off like how Biden blew off the dead soldiers in Afghanistan.

you havent linked chit since that 50 mask 50 mile hoax.
you provided a definition. i provided the original definition and the link to back up my claim.





umm??? u didnt read the definition i provided with link and all. c'mon mannnnnnn.............................

Lefties don't read, they just talk and parrot.

So then recombinant and toxoid vaccines aren't actually vaccines.

i see what you mean.............

how come they only changed the definition with the mRNA experiment

To fit their agenda.