Not so. We see plenty of anti-vaxxers on this very forum laughing at people for dieing of Covid, and doing things like making fun of them for being overweight.

I find factors of difference less than 3x pointless in this type of discussion.

Guy in that meme is lying though.

And there is an element of schadenfreude since it is an active choice they made . It is more of an deliberate choice than say, overdosing on fentanyl.

And I work at a hospital, I might be less sociopathic if I wasn't being surrounded by their bodies going on two years while half of America believes in what they're being gaslighted with.

This post was edited by Skinned on Sep 2 2021 09:36am

and by percent J&J isnt 3x more safe, its just more than 3x less used.

u know u can just say u didnt want the Mrna vaccine without having to do mental gymnastics with pretty clear math to make that call, right? u still got a vaccine, and that's good. u still dont trust Mrna, even though the fatality stats dont back that up, and that's fine. we dont need cut and dry stats to back up every decision we make, and in my estimation you've chosen a good middle ground course of action.

Typical vaccines have a 5 year testing period for long term side effects. There's no way you win this. Even if you trust the Billionaire Multinational Cool-Aid. One of the inventors of mRNA technology said as much.

u said it had less short term deaths, i showed it didnt, u said Mrna was still unsafe, now you're shifting to long term side effects.

stop wriggling.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Sep 2 2021 10:46am

If something kills you five years from now, it is unsafe.

Stop wriggling.

If might be the greatest disparity of letters used and importance for any word in the English language.

i already said getting J&J because of worries about long term effects of Mrna is a fine stance to have, using flawed short term stats that actually show the opposite of your point however is a failure to math.



This post was edited by thesnipa on Sep 2 2021 11:07am

That's a pretty fair argument, but they are also all above the age of 40.

If the virus utilizes ACE-2 receptors, it can have profound effects on fertility. And the younger people are the ones more likely to show immune issues, possibly because their immune system is often still developing.

The Israel study on fertility was horseshit as well, it only observed in-vitro fertilizations.

My flat opinion is that anyone above the age of 40 should get it.