d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Georgia Elections
Prev1171819202128Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jan 6 2021 08:58am
Quote (Ghot @ Jan 6 2021 08:48am)
Nah. Living longer but losing freedom of speech, is not my cup of tea.
That Section 230 thing is some seriously bad legislation, for example.


/edit Section 230 is why McConnell has been holding up the $2k stimmy checks.


This forum doesnt exist without section 230
Member
Posts: 105,148
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Jan 6 2021 09:02am
Quote (Thor123422 @ Jan 6 2021 09:58am)
This forum doesnt exist without section 230




Yeah, that's what they keep telling you. A lot of Section 230 is good, but some parts are a direct attack on the 1st Amendment. !984, here we come. :/


/edit https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230

Section c2A is the bad part.


Quote
(2) Civil liability
No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be held liable on account of—

(A) any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected; or

(B) any action taken to enable or make available to information content providers or others the technical means to restrict access to material described in paragraph (1).[1]



You can fit almost anything under the phrase... "otherwise objectionable".

This post was edited by Ghot on Jan 6 2021 09:23am
Member
Posts: 18,491
Joined: Sep 2 2008
Gold: 0.00
Jan 6 2021 09:06am
sky is always falling for someone
you'll be fine
Member
Posts: 21,058
Joined: Jun 3 2019
Gold: 930.45
Warn: 10%
Jan 6 2021 09:29am
Quote (Ghot @ 6 Jan 2021 10:02)
Yeah, that's what they keep telling you. A lot of Section 230 is good, but some parts are a direct attack on the 1st Amendment. !984, here we come. :/


/edit https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230

Section c2A is the bad part.





You can fit almost anything under the phrase... "otherwise objectionable".


private companies
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jan 6 2021 09:47am
Quote (Ghot @ Jan 6 2021 09:02am)
Yeah, that's what they keep telling you. A lot of Section 230 is good, but some parts are a direct attack on the 1st Amendment. !984, here we come. :/
/edit https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230
Section c2A is the bad part.
You can fit almost anything under the phrase... "otherwise objectionable".


That is exactly the point. If we remove that part I can sue njag for removing our unisex bathrooms conversation. It's to give huge leeway to allow moderation.
Member
Posts: 21,058
Joined: Jun 3 2019
Gold: 930.45
Warn: 10%
Jan 6 2021 09:48am
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
QQ ya fuckin loser baby

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1346845109736845318

Quote
These scoundrels are only toying with the
@sendavidperdue
(a great guy) vote. Just didn’t want to announce quite yet. They’ve got as many ballots as are necessary. Rigged Election!
Member
Posts: 33,928
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Jan 6 2021 09:51am
Quote (Ghot @ Jan 6 2021 09:38am)
Well the bad part is we will lose a lot of our freedoms if the Dems control the House, Senate and the Presidency. The good part is, we'll probably get those $2k stimmy checks.



One or two Senate dems can flake out quite easily. Removing the fillibuster would be incredibly unpopular
Member
Posts: 41,270
Joined: Apr 14 2006
Gold: 1,788.71
Jan 6 2021 09:54am
So trump actively sabotages GOP races. Then after losing says see dems are conspiring against you guys too!

Lmao

Art of the deal
Member
Posts: 105,148
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Jan 6 2021 09:54am
Quote (Thor123422 @ Jan 6 2021 10:47am)
That is exactly the point. If we remove that part I can sue njag for removing our unisex bathrooms conversation. It's to give huge leeway to allow moderation.




I understand that. That's the "simple" part.
The complex part is the things I mentioned above.

The most dangerous part is the part I bolded. Once you start allowing any entities, anywhere, to disregard the 1st amendment, it won't be long before it falls apart.
Member
Posts: 33,928
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Jan 6 2021 09:56am
Quote (Bazi @ Jan 6 2021 10:54am)
So trump actively sabotages GOP races. Then after losing says see dems are conspiring against you guys too!

Lmao

Art of the deal


This could be better for the GOP in the long term

GOP slept on election fraud and will be forced to face it now
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1171819202128Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll