snap chat for dumb(er) people

It's really just a bunch of weird kids dancing on there for the pleasure of President Xi and the rest of the CCP.

where I live, if you criticize the CCP you are labelled a racist

thank god I don't live in China

Meh, the bolded part is not really true. Objectively, Garland deserved a vote on the Senate floor, but McConnell didnt allow it out of political calculus (would have put a really toxic vote on the record of lots of vulnerable Republican senators).

https://mobile.twitter.com/ARealPrincesa/status/1307300374169223168

don’t forget to focus the loss of her..err the justice..and her enduring legacy

People are stupid. "Criticize Mexico and racist!" "Criticize Islam and racist!" "Criticize CCP and racist!"

Mexico is a nation of 126 million people with all races represented.

Islam is a religion with multiple "sects" that includes over a billion worshippers, with again, all races represented.

CCP is a political party that leads (dictates to?) a nation. Race doesn't even matter, they bear the same scrutiny as any political leadership.

Also, tik tok is stupid, snapchat hasn't been used outside of pornhub hookups for years, and in general, these "trendy" apps are cancer.



Refusing to vote indicates where the vote would go. But even saying, "Not gonna vote" is making the choice. Choice is "not acceptable". Had Garland been nominated by Trump, would have have gotten in? I'm willing to bet it could have been voted no.

BTW, just for entertainment sakes, here's something from BB for you:

https://babylonbee.com/news/giggling-trump-prank-calls-merrick-garland-to-tell-him-hes-been-shortlisted-for-scotus

This post was edited by InsaneBobb on Sep 24 2020 08:23pm

This is incorrect, and was demonstrated as such during Obama's term where they refused to confirm district judges despite openly admitting they had no issues with it and the judges passing easily once the vote actually got to the floor.

Han is a huge demo in China.

Sometimes what's good for the goose is good for the gander.

thats not what the conversation is about.
Senate under Obama 2016 changed the narrative about not give a vote over SCOTUS due to election year.
Same applies now they wont follow their own narrative.. I'm not talking about trump appointing.
talking about double standards

Yep. And in China, if you criticize Xi/the CCP -- you get 18 years.

https://mb.ntd.com/china-sentences-xi-critic-to-18-years-for-graft_510226.html

This post was edited by GLYC123 on Sep 24 2020 08:52pm