d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Iran Boogaloo
Prev1171819202183Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Jan 4 2020 05:48pm
Quote (excellence @ Jan 4 2020 06:39pm)
his hot-take is made even more hilarious because he's attempting to make this about 'black and brown people' when he's the palest pastiest privileged lefty of his generation, and much of Iran is made up of ethnic Caucasians :rofl:

hey maybe he heard of the Iran football team and thought this would be a good way to score a tryout. of course he wouldn't know there's a difference between American Football and Football in the rest of the world :lol:


We know you guys have been ready to bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran.

I think that football player is talking about how despite being caucasians, arabs and persians are still called sand niggers at your secret klub meetings.

You neocons are all the same lol.

/e E I know you aren't these things :p. My trolling is on.

This post was edited by Skinned on Jan 4 2020 05:58pm
Member
Posts: 2,660
Joined: Mar 28 2010
Gold: 0.00
Jan 4 2020 06:10pm
Quote (fender @ Jan 4 2020 05:44pm)
i bet you don't even realise how mindblowingly hypocritical that is, considering iran is actually a regional power, whereas the US is an occupying force that has no business "expanding their military power and influence in the region", but does it anyway...

also, if you're a warmongering honourless scumbag, you can always just renege on deals. as long as there is nothing that physically prevents trump from doing that (like reasonably steep stairs, or a glass floor that only holds 250 lbs), there is nothing that could have been put in there to prevent that. it's just the nature of the power imbalance between the two countries. nice try blaming obama for trump's shitty behaviour though, i almost thought you people had given up on the 'thanks, obama' meme...



inb4 pivot away from what's 'justified' and 'appropriate' to ignorantly and proudly claiming "we do it because we can" - which is exactly my point, america is not the good guy in this. obviously iran's theocratic dictatorship is neither, but that just makes it two scum nations fighting it out, and not 'good vs. evil' which hilariously still seems to be the prevailing narrative in the US...


We are not an occupying force in Iraq. We are there with the Iraqi government's ok.

Obama did not go through congress for the Iran deal. You make a treaty with 2/3 senate support it becomes law. He made a treaty that any president could strike down with a stroke of the pen at any time.

Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Jan 4 2020 06:16pm
Quote (krackprophet @ 4 Jan 2020 19:10)
We are not an occupying force in Iraq. We are there with the Iraqi government's ok.

Obama did not go through congress for the Iran deal. You make a treaty with 2/3 senate support it becomes law. He made a treaty that any president could strike down with a stroke of the pen at any time.

he (fender aka heinrich) doesn't understand how our laws and procedures work. the only document he understands is the book 'my struggle'
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Jan 4 2020 06:22pm
Quote (krackprophet @ 5 Jan 2020 01:10)
We are not an occupying force in Iraq. We are there with the Iraqi government's ok.

Obama did not go through congress for the Iran deal. You make a treaty with 2/3 senate support it becomes law. He made a treaty that any president could strike down with a stroke of the pen at any time.


that's hilarious. so if you break into someone's home, kill the homeowner and let you friend move in, you're then not an intruder when your buddy says you can stay? that's some solid fucking logic right there...

as to the second part: wrong. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2018/05/09/if-the-iran-deal-had-been-a-senate-confirmed-treaty-would-trump-have-been-forced-to-stay-in-nope/


again, an honourless scumbag like trump can always just renege on such deals and do what his donors want him to do: don't seek a better deal (which he couldn't negotiate anyway, because he is entirely incompetent), but pressure them into a military conflict - ideally in a way that looks like we are the good guys to make it more popular and not as costly politically...
Member
Posts: 2,660
Joined: Mar 28 2010
Gold: 0.00
Jan 4 2020 06:31pm
Quote (fender @ Jan 4 2020 06:22pm)
that's hilarious. so if you break into someone's home, kill the homeowner and let you friend move in, you're then not an intruder when your buddy says you can stay? that's some solid fucking logic right there...

as to the second part: wrong. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2018/05/09/if-the-iran-deal-had-been-a-senate-confirmed-treaty-would-trump-have-been-forced-to-stay-in-nope/


again, an honourless scumbag like trump can always just renege on such deals and do what his donors want him to do: don't seek a better deal (which he couldn't negotiate anyway, because he is entirely incompetent), but pressure them into a military conflict - ideally in a way that looks like we are the good guys to make it more popular and not as costly politically...


Read your own article ffs.

Quote
The question went to the Supreme Court — which refused to comment on the merits. It effectively dismissed the case, holding that the question was a political question beyond the court’s capacity. Justice Lewis Powell’s concurring opinion noted that such a case might be justiciable someday — but at present “it cannot be said that either the Senate or the House has rejected the President’s claim. If the Congress chooses not to confront the President, it is not our task to do so.”

With no such confrontation in sight, the D.C. District Court took the same stance in 2002. The House members’ suit was set aside both because its members had no standing to sue and because they could not be said to speak for Congress. “Since President Bush announced his intention to withdraw from the ABM Treaty, neither the House nor Congress has made any attempt whatsoever to register disapproval as a body, or to insist on a role in the termination of the Treaty.”


Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Jan 4 2020 06:35pm
Quote (krackprophet @ 5 Jan 2020 01:31)
Read your own article ffs.


i did, and unlike you i actually understood what it said. going through congress (which would not have been receptive to a reasonable deal anyway, thanks to GOP obstruction) would NOT have protected the deal from trump's incompetence and warmongering. l2r maybe...
Member
Posts: 50,920
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Jan 4 2020 06:37pm
Quote (fender @ Jan 4 2020 06:35pm)
i did, and unlike you i actually understood what it said. going through congress (which would not have been receptive to a reasonable deal anyway, thanks to GOP obstruction) would NOT have protected the deal from trump's incompetence and warmongering. l2r maybe...


>going through congress to protect a treaty would not have protected a treaty if congress chose not to protect that treaty

Truly profound, Heinrich descendant of Geobbels
Member
Posts: 52,315
Joined: Mar 25 2007
Gold: 6,487.40
Jan 4 2020 06:37pm
that clown is about the put the world into total war

Member
Posts: 2,660
Joined: Mar 28 2010
Gold: 0.00
Jan 4 2020 06:37pm
Quote (fender @ Jan 4 2020 06:35pm)
i did, and unlike you i actually understood what it said. going through congress (which would not have been receptive to a reasonable deal anyway, thanks to GOP obstruction) would NOT have protected the deal from trump's incompetence and warmongering. l2r maybe...


Going through congress would give you legal grounds to challenge the decision if congress disapproves.
Member
Posts: 52,315
Joined: Mar 25 2007
Gold: 6,487.40
Jan 4 2020 06:42pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1171819202183Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll