d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > House Gop Members Storm Scif
Prev1171819202127Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 105,150
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Oct 25 2019 05:04pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 25 2019 07:03pm)
Like with a knife?




LOL. More like a Louisville slugger.
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Oct 25 2019 05:15pm
Quote (Ghot @ 26 Oct 2019 00:53)
And Hillary Crook was gonna win with 100% certainty.


/e Hell, it's not even 100% certain the House is gonna vote to impeach. This is just like russiagate. Decide Trump needs to be taken down... THEN manufacture the evidence.


trump and his cronies went on national tv and admitted what now other REPUBLICAN appointees confirm. if that is 'manufacturing' evidence, you should blame the right wing for it...

btw, 'russiagate' established that trump encouraged and welcomed russian meddling to benefit him in the 2016 election. the mueller report documents how he lied and obstructed justice in multiple instances in order to cover it up - you should read it if you have the time...
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Oct 25 2019 05:18pm
Quote (fender @ 25 Oct 2019 19:15)
trump and his cronies went on national tv and admitted what now other REPUBLICAN appointees confirm. if that is 'manufacturing' evidence, you should blame the right wing for it...

btw, 'russiagate' established that trump encouraged and welcomed russian meddling to benefit him in the 2016 election. the mueller report documents how he lied and obstructed justice in multiple instances in order to cover it up - you should read it if you have the time...


so why did the (D)s move to ukrainegate if russiagate proved obstruction of justice?
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Oct 25 2019 05:25pm
Quote (excellence @ 26 Oct 2019 01:18)
so why did the (D)s move to ukrainegate if russiagate proved obstruction of justice?


Because it's hard to shutdown a president, even if it's the worst clown in the short history of your country.
The actual second attempt seems easier tho.

This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Oct 25 2019 05:25pm
Member
Posts: 93,001
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Oct 25 2019 05:33pm
Quote (excellence @ Oct 25 2019 06:18pm)
so why did the (D)s move to ukrainegate if russiagate proved obstruction of justice?


note they also skipped over "we can impeach on obstruction of justice"

straight from "you cant convict a sitting president" to "look at Ukraine"
Member
Posts: 28,884
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Oct 25 2019 05:47pm
Many people don't care about the finer points any longer. Even more intelligent people don't care and their attention span has been exhausted by the barrage of bullshit for years now.

The problem with this Ukraine saga is the Democrats have been so preoccupied with displacing Trump by any means that it doesn't matter what it turns up most people will take it as political.

You can't spend 3 years calling him a Russian asset and saying 'anonymous sources totally told us it's true' and for it to come out to be completely not true and then expect for Trump supporters or even the fence sitters to suddenly buy in. Your objectivity is shot and anything that comes up will be viewed through that these guys are bias lens.

This post was edited by ofthevoid on Oct 25 2019 05:48pm
Member
Posts: 1,701
Joined: Mar 16 2009
Gold: 0.00
Oct 25 2019 06:13pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 25 2019 04:33pm)
note they also skipped over "we can impeach on obstruction of justice"

straight from "you cant convict a sitting president" to "look at Ukraine"


perhaps but the potential obstructions of justice were in the investigation and it was even signed off as being impeachable by many other investigators as well. Just because the dems didn't use it doesn't mean that it was bs lol
Member
Posts: 93,001
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Oct 25 2019 08:08pm
Quote (GodSmiter @ Oct 25 2019 07:13pm)
perhaps but the potential obstructions of justice were in the investigation and it was even signed off as being impeachable by many other investigators as well. Just because the dems didn't use it doesn't mean that it was bs lol


i don't think it was necessarily b.s.

the dems just like to play back and forth with concepts like conviction and trial. impeachment and removal. investigation and findings. collusion and encouragement. etc.

they keep overshooting is all.
Member
Posts: 1,701
Joined: Mar 16 2009
Gold: 0.00
Oct 25 2019 08:09pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 25 2019 07:08pm)
i don't think it was necessarily b.s.

the dems just like to play back and forth with concepts like conviction and trial. impeachment and removal. investigation and findings. collusion and encouragement. etc.

they keep overshooting is all.


agreed
Member
Posts: 33,928
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Oct 25 2019 08:37pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 25 2019 10:08pm)
i don't think it was necessarily b.s.

the dems just like to play back and forth with concepts like conviction and trial. impeachment and removal. investigation and findings. collusion and encouragement. etc.

they keep overshooting is all.


ALL TALK NO ACTION!
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1171819202127Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll