Terrible signal, double post sorry

This post was edited by Shinobi on Feb 13 2024 01:53pm

Traps make Snipa's grandpa skeet, confirmed.

Y'all would decry confirmation bias and general lack of scientific process in any other domain should someone approach a topic from your same logic, but give yourselves infinite freedom to engage in those same cognitive pitfalls because it's about a community that you dislike. Simple as.

This post was edited by Handcuffs on Feb 13 2024 01:55pm

Did you remotely read the conversation being had?

Everything you just wrote, makes almost zero sense in the context of the conversation being had.


The conversation generated from the discussion of restricted vs non-restricted time firearms and that for the majority use cases of civilians , bolt action, lever, semi autos and shotguns fill the majority of all purposes. Then a user said YEAH WELL what if 30 hogs start running you down. Which is retarded.

Again being in the context of the average use case for the average individual and for an average individual who thinks they need a firearm for self defence, 100% a pump shotgun with 00 buck will do, and perform vastly better because the average person has minimal gun experience, piss poor aim and will panic.

I live in the Arctic where every single new person thinks , well I cant go out without a firearm, a wolf will eat me. I ask them the simple question of, have you had experience with firearms before, no. Do you think in the average person purchasing self defence fire-arms can aim worth shit. No. Let alone hit a wolf running at you. lmao.

This post was edited by SBD on Feb 13 2024 02:04pm

Hijacking and changing science for political activism doesn't all of the sudden make things that were viewed as abnormal for eons now normal, it actually erodes what science starts to mean. I don't really care how many PHDs are going to tell us why cutting off your normally developed genitals is totally normal and not mental illness.

Are you trans with mental illness? Read what you wrote



Whether you’re talking about average civilians or not doesn’t remedy the fact that people are talking about X or Y guns being unnecessary. All I said is that you have no idea what you were talking about in you previous comment which is obviously true, you’re an idiot that’s likely never shot a gun, and you reply in your rage of assumption whilst doubling down to the people here that you’re an idiot with no experience.

Now would you care to tell me how I’m wrong or continue to live in your fantasy where you’re the expert on everything behind your screen and everyone else is in middle school?

Lmao if you are comparing the tactics of wolves vs hogs in your edit that confirms everything i’ve stated above. Also it’s not your or anyone’s right to determine what is viable for self defense. More money means more to me than less money and as such a stronger more capable weapon is more valuable to me than a lesser. If I can ensure I am in a safer zone I always prefer a handgun. But that is definitely not the safest road to take when there are too many unknowns in the wild.


“No, nor have you and nor would an AR or AK do anything if the hands of a normal civilian should 30 feral pigs rush you, no more than a normal pump shotgun would do, if they dont scare at the first few shots that number will run you over either way, pretty stupid question to be honest”

When you care to explain where my reply missed context you let me know. Til then you just keep on diverting & hiding.

This post was edited by Shinobi on Feb 13 2024 02:14pm

Oh my, context matters idiot. Good lord.

Ban trans people

What is this claim of "hijacking and changing science for political activism" rooted in? What evidence do you have for this other than your general opinion? This is why we have a licensing process so hacks don't make decisions about communities that they have, as you said, "limited experience with".

Clown thinks south central Texas is basically Brooklyn.