d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Trump 2016 > Trump Vs Clinton
Prev1177717781779178017813169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Apr 12 2018 01:48pm
Quote (thesnipa @ 12 Apr 2018 20:41)
i didnt say it was, i made a joke which u didnt get. then i went on a rant because i felt like it. i'm not saying anything is representative of anything and didnt even read your or endless' post other than a skim.


i see, but why are you so incredibly defensive over a 'joke'?
Member
Posts: 91,078
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,504.69
Apr 12 2018 01:50pm
Quote (fender @ Apr 12 2018 01:48pm)
i see, but why are you so incredibly defensive over a 'joke'?


what part of my post makes you think i'm "overly defensive", the length?

when i go on a long winded meandering rant its a pleasure cruise son.
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Apr 12 2018 01:55pm
Quote (thesnipa @ 12 Apr 2018 20:50)
what part of my post makes you think i'm "overly defensive", the length?

when i go on a long winded meandering rant its a pleasure cruise son.


the part where you felt the need to justify your rant (twice now) although i never even took issue with it, buddy.
Member
Posts: 24,506
Joined: Mar 2 2008
Gold: 8,231.41
Apr 12 2018 02:01pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Apr 12 2018 11:58am)
I just can't drop the cash on a VR headset right now. How are they?


I'll send your wife home with mine, she can show you how we used it.
Member
Posts: 91,078
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,504.69
Apr 12 2018 02:07pm
Quote (fender @ Apr 12 2018 01:55pm)
the part where you felt the need to justify your rant (twice now) although i never even took issue with it, buddy.


justify? ummm wat?

you quoted me, i responded. your post had things that didnt apply to me. justify seems like an odd word, you seemed confused (three times now) so i thought id explain myself.

my rant was hyperbolic and said in jest sardonically, how can i be justifying something i didnt even seriously say?
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Apr 12 2018 02:11pm
Quote (thesnipa @ 12 Apr 2018 21:07)
justify? ummm wat?

you quoted me, i responded. your post had things that didnt apply to me. justify seems like an odd word, you seemed confused (three times now) so i thought id explain myself.

my rant was hyperbolic and said in jest sardonically, how can i be justifying something i didnt even seriously say?


read my last post again. slowly. you seem a little upset and there is absolutely no reason for it. we're good, champ...
Member
Posts: 91,078
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,504.69
Apr 12 2018 02:14pm
Quote (fender @ Apr 12 2018 02:11pm)
read my last post again. slowly. you seem a little upset and there is absolutely no reason for it. we're good, champ...


i perceived this post as taking issue:

Quote (fender @ Apr 12 2018 01:21pm)
just because SOME of the over the top SJW idiots are claiming that, doesn't mean it's representative of the whole #metoo movement, or even a majority - and somehow justifying endlesscry's idiotic 'logic', to which my response was pointing out the concept of consent...


as it directly references points from my post.

maybe you just got triggered by me using the term "SJW" and assumed i was applying it to a larger subset than it applies to. i dont do that tho.

is there a reason that you consistently tell people they are mad? serious question. do you actually find this is a legitimate tactic in arguing?

Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Apr 12 2018 02:34pm
Quote (thesnipa @ 12 Apr 2018 21:14)
i perceived this post as taking issue:



as it directly references points from my post.

maybe you just got triggered by me using the term "SJW" and assumed i was applying it to a larger subset than it applies to. i dont do that tho.

is there a reason that you consistently tell people they are mad? serious question. do you actually find this is a legitimate tactic in arguing?


see the reason i assumed you were a little upset maybe is that you keep missing really obvious things. case in point: assuming i 'got triggered' (the good old rubber and glue tactic, very 'legitimate') by the term "SJW", when i actually replied to it acknowledging that some of the "SJW idiots" actually DO apply your 'joking' definition of consent.
meaning i think higher of you than your posts warrant, providing you a convenient excuse for your intellectual shortcomings, so i'm a bit surprised that too offended you... i'll try to be even more careful with your feelings in the future, i promise.
Member
Posts: 16,621
Joined: Jan 7 2017
Gold: 90.58
Apr 12 2018 02:36pm
Quote (fender @ Apr 12 2018 12:34pm)
see the reason i assumed you were a little upset maybe is that you keep missing really obvious things. case in point: assuming i 'got triggered' (the good old rubber and glue tactic, very 'legitimate') by the term "SJW", when i actually replied to it acknowledging that some of the "SJW idiots" actually DO apply your 'joking' definition of consent.
meaning i think higher of you than your posts warrant, providing you a convenient excuse for your intellectual shortcomings, so i'm a bit surprised that too offended you... i'll try to be even more careful with your feelings in the future, i promise.


this posts reeks of passive aggressiveness. that's not how you act when you just said "were good, champ"

language barrier issue i'm guessing.
Member
Posts: 91,078
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,504.69
Apr 12 2018 02:39pm
Quote (fender @ Apr 12 2018 02:34pm)
see the reason i assumed you were a little upset maybe is that you keep missing really obvious things. case in point: assuming i 'got triggered' (the good old rubber and glue tactic, very 'legitimate') by the term "SJW", when i actually replied to it acknowledging that some of the "SJW idiots" actually DO apply your 'joking' definition of consent.
meaning i think higher of you than your posts warrant, providing you a convenient excuse for your intellectual shortcomings, so i'm a bit surprised that too offended you... i'll try to be even more careful with your feelings in the future, i promise.


no, i wasn't using "triggered" in a "nou" sense responding to you saying i was upset. I was using it in a clinical sense, meaning that when i said SJW you were triggered by it and extrapolated things incorrectly. happy, sad, mad, w/e emotion had nothing to do with it.

so in this case, you got triggered by the phrase triggered. im not sure what emotion it elicited. u can let us know if youd like.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1177717781779178017813169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll