Quote (Goomshill @ Mar 23 2020 05:14pm)
As far as I can tell, the democrats were negotiating in good faith in the senate and the 5 days of talks produced the senate bill with all sorts of conditions and compromises directly related to the coronavirus. It was those negotiations that clarified the amount of money per person, amount per child, how many rounds of payments. They added in clauses to make sure it didn't phase in with rich people getting more than poor ones, and made sure it phased out from $75-99k income. And they added the conditions to the corporate bailout to say a $425k executive pay cap, no stock buybacks and must keep payroll intact.
We have to remember that this entire bill was an overtly socialist proposal to begin with, we had Andrew Yang saluting what was basically a month or two in universal basic income. The republicans were outflanking the democrats on the left. In anything but an extreme crisis, this bill was unthinkable. And they added in reasonable concessions to democrats on top of all that, stuff that really wasn't dealbreakers and had a lot of good sense behind it.
But then Nancy Pelosi showed up on capitol hill, axed the entire process and produced this ideological wishlist garbage that can serve no purpose but obstructionism.
Do you think it's possible Nancy and co. miscalculated in how much "weakness" they saw from the Republicans because they're in the hot seat and are finally willing to compromised in a crisis situation? An overreach after getting good things in the current bill?
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Mar 23 2020 05:20pm)
Yet Skinned et al. keep insisting on their "GOP bad, puppets of their corporate overlords, all they ever do is fuck over poor people - Dems good, always fighting for the little man" talking points.
And they call us cultists... :rolleyes:
I think that, unfortunately in the US, you can't expect any amount of good faith during election year.