d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Coronavirus Thread
Prev1175176177178179910Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 22,442
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 76.11
Mar 23 2020 03:14pm
Quote (Skinned @ Mar 23 2020 12:59pm)
I love that our Congress is fighting over who are winners and losers of this bailout with a focus on their own constituency and pleasing their supporters. It is too bad they can't just problem solve through this.


This. Each party has really fucked this process up. Only partisan hacks would try and argue that their party is pious and pure.
Member
Posts: 50,929
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Mar 23 2020 03:14pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Mar 23 2020 04:08pm)
No one would mind it if the Democrats were negotiating in good faith, and insisted on reasonable provisions directly related to the coronavirus crisis. For example, they could insist that the planned direct cash payments (see my previous post) are less steeply tiered, and that they shall apply to all households (without a qualifying threshold income of $2500).

But when they want items from their policy wishlist which are not related at all to the crisis at hand, like diversity quotas for boards, handouts to unions and abortion providers, limits on deportations or fossil emission reductions, you cannot possibly argue that their priority is immediate relief for affected Americans.


As far as I can tell, the democrats were negotiating in good faith in the senate and the 5 days of talks produced the senate bill with all sorts of conditions and compromises directly related to the coronavirus. It was those negotiations that clarified the amount of money per person, amount per child, how many rounds of payments. They added in clauses to make sure it didn't phase in with rich people getting more than poor ones, and made sure it phased out from $75-99k income. And they added the conditions to the corporate bailout to say a $425k executive pay cap, no stock buybacks and must keep payroll intact.

We have to remember that this entire bill was an overtly socialist proposal to begin with, we had Andrew Yang saluting what was basically a month or two in universal basic income. The republicans were outflanking the democrats on the left. In anything but an extreme crisis, this bill was unthinkable. And they added in reasonable concessions to democrats on top of all that, stuff that really wasn't dealbreakers and had a lot of good sense behind it.

But then Nancy Pelosi showed up on capitol hill, axed the entire process and produced this ideological wishlist garbage that can serve no purpose but obstructionism.
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Mar 23 2020 03:17pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Mar 23 2020 05:09pm)
so assuming congress has abdicated any responsibility to address the crisis, what state, local & federal options are left on the table?

Can state governments pass emergency powers giving them the ability to compel factories to re-open and produce ventilators?
or could Trump exert the biggest executive power play since Lincoln and use an executive order to do something like use the military for domestic healthcare, or just seize the power of the purse with some arbitrary loophole?
I can envision something ridiculous like "Allow small businesses to file lawsuits against the government for damages incurred by a failed federal coronavirus response, which will be automatically settled out of the judgment for an amount exactly equal to the payroll subsidies we intended to give them, with the 'settlement' conditioned on that money going to payroll". If Obama could use the judgment fund to conjured up funding for an Iran ransom, why not use that precedent? If blatant executive overreach is the only option left us, maybe Trump should do it


Why hasn't the Defense Production Act been used? Either it's massive incompetence or a failure of messaging because no one seems to know why it isn't being used by Trump.
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Mar 23 2020 03:19pm
Quote (Handcuffs @ Mar 23 2020 05:14pm)
This. Each party has really fucked this process up. Only partisan hacks would try and argue that their party is pious and pure.


We have plenty of those here. I will in knowledge that politicians from both parties are scum especially leadership.

The Republican party has made it their business to the reduce the amount of Americans with health care and employment rights For decades now they don't get to act like they're coming into the rescue. And the democrats are always prone to stuffing so much pork in the bills we think are trying to create a charcuterie.

This post was edited by Skinned on Mar 23 2020 03:20pm
Member
Posts: 54,196
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Mar 23 2020 03:20pm
Quote (Goomshill @ 23 Mar 2020 22:14)
As far as I can tell, the democrats were negotiating in good faith in the senate and the 5 days of talks produced the senate bill with all sorts of conditions and compromises directly related to the coronavirus. It was those negotiations that clarified the amount of money per person, amount per child, how many rounds of payments. They added in clauses to make sure it didn't phase in with rich people getting more than poor ones, and made sure it phased out from $75-99k income. And they added the conditions to the corporate bailout to say a $425k executive pay cap, no stock buybacks and must keep payroll intact.

We have to remember that this entire bill was an overtly socialist proposal to begin with, we had Andrew Yang saluting what was basically a month or two in universal basic income. The republicans were outflanking the democrats on the left. In anything but an extreme crisis, this bill was unthinkable. And they added in reasonable concessions to democrats on top of all that, stuff that really wasn't dealbreakers and had a lot of good sense behind it.

But then Nancy Pelosi showed up on capitol hill, axed the entire process and produced this ideological wishlist garbage that can serve no purpose but obstructionism.


Yet Skinned et al. keep insisting on their "GOP bad, puppets of their corporate overlords, all they ever do is fuck over poor people - Dems good, always fighting for the little man" talking points.
And they call us cultists... :rolleyes:
Member
Posts: 22,442
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 76.11
Mar 23 2020 03:21pm
Quote (Skinned @ Mar 23 2020 02:19pm)
We have plenty of those here. I will in knowledge that politicians from both parties are scum especially leadership.

The Republican party has made it their business to the reduce the amount of Americans with health care and employment rights For decades now they don't get to act like they're coming into the rescue. And the democrats are always prone to stuffing so much pork in the bills we think are trying to create a charcuterie.


The true enemy is the bourgeoisie, Comrade!
Member
Posts: 1,143
Joined: Jan 29 2014
Gold: 13.95
Mar 23 2020 03:21pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Mar 23 2020 05:08pm)
No one would mind it if the Democrats were negotiating in good faith, and insisted on reasonable provisions directly related to the coronavirus crisis. For example, they could insist that the planned direct cash payments (see my previous post) are less steeply tiered, and that they shall apply to all households (without a qualifying threshold income of $2500).

But when they instead demand items from their policy wishlist which are not related at all to the crisis at hand, like e.g. diversity quotas for boards, handouts to unions and abortion providers, limits on deportations or stricter carbon emission goals, you cannot possibly argue that their priority is immediate relief for struggling Americans.


I know it varies for some people but I only acknowledge a thing when it happens, in this case is when a bill is passed. It's not what it'd like like either, but I'm amazed republicans actually going for it. This is also why I didn't bother to get informed on it this early, that's just useless information in my brain at the current time.

I guess I was wrong, unless you count the mega poor. But that's not surprising for republicans, they wouldn't want to give money to people who don't work because they're lazy and/or illegals. I mean, Senator Rand did call them non-people after all.
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Mar 23 2020 03:21pm
Quote (RedFromWinter @ Mar 23 2020 02:04pm)
Rustic Inn's Lemon Angel FTW :) Nothing like a good pie rivalry for consumer benefit.


I'll have to check that one out the next time we drive up to the Shore. Usually do a fall color drive up there.
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Mar 23 2020 03:22pm
Quote (Handcuffs @ Mar 23 2020 05:14pm)
This. Each party has really fucked this process up. Only partisan hacks would try and argue that their party is pious and pure.


But pretending both parties are equally bad seems to help Republicans, because usually Democrats are better at governing.
Member
Posts: 50,929
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Mar 23 2020 03:24pm
Quote (IceMage @ Mar 23 2020 04:17pm)
Why hasn't the Defense Production Act been used? Either it's massive incompetence or a failure of messaging because no one seems to know why it isn't being used by Trump.


well one issue is that the companies who can produce the needed items have generally already ramped up production significantly. 3M is making twice as many masks, Philips has quadrupled ventilator production
but production already takes weeks or months on the supply chain and exerting the DPA to force businesses who don't make these commercial products to switch all their production lines and get new equipment, well that would be a pretty drastic step that wouldn't have any impact until months from now. And I guess it comes down to that decision making on where we think we are on the curve. If things get much worse in coming months it would help, but if things get better, we'd be heavily disrupting industry and wrecking their commercial operations without compensation and setting a precedent to nationalize an industry willy nilly.

So its not like its a quick fix. There's some tradeoffs and questionable utility. It might prove to be a necessary step and failing to do so could worsen a crisis, but it could also be a complete waste.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1175176177178179910Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll