Quote (fender @ Sep 25 2018 01:18pm)
it's not my fault that you're unable to identify a post riddled with ad hominems and 'arguments' against strawman positions no one involved in this really holds. why you resort to your little 'he does that every time, it doesn't even apply' routine i don't know. my best guess is that you're trying to convince your imaginary audience and me that you REALLY don't mind when i point such things out, and that's ok. you guys like your ad homs, and i like pointing them out - it's just fascinating to see how someone could confuse what has to come first in this little game...
you constantly acting like a victim when you're one of the worst ad hom attackers and strawman argument makers is why we're all laughing at you. we all do it, all of us, to a person. but there is only a small group of people who fluff out every post by whining about it, and you just so happen to do it in almost every post. its so lock step that it often reads like copy pasta. some people say "umm" imperceptibly before they speak, you say "setting asside the ad hom attacks and strawman arguments" imperceptibly before you get to what you're actually going to say. its funny, change it or get laughed at, tbh we dont care.
Quote
also, concerning the pro-life issue, i was strictly on topic and merely asked you a question without suggesting anything. i even explained to you what made me curious (acting like you didn't get what i meant by 'anti-choice'), and clarified that i'm convinced both sides mean the best regarding the issue even before you eventually replied. the fact that you feel that it was a 'trap' of some sort genuinely surprises me.
i have legitimately never heard the term "anti-choice", and when i asked for clarification i said "abortion?" because i thought that's what you meant, i didnt feign ignorance. try not to lie. you brought it up out of the blue in an attempt to trap me as being biased towards a GOP minded scotus pick. it was an ok attempt, take the compliment, i just saw it a mile away.