d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Trump 2016 > Trump Vs Clinton
Prev1174317441745174617473169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 46,672
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 22,164.69
Mar 22 2018 05:59pm
{Stance widens}
Member
Posts: 52,309
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,404.67
Mar 22 2018 06:04pm
Quote (Skinned @ 23 Mar 2018 00:54)
Here is a history lesson about your club:
...

This is why Clinton got impeached over a BJ, which failed, because they were all doing really weird shit.


are you just pretending to be this uniformed? clinton got impeached over lying under oath, not because of the BJ itself.

and that super conservative homophobic family value politiicians often times are bigotted closet fags is really nothing new either. everybody knows that.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Mar 22 2018 06:04pm
Member
Posts: 48,844
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 5,016.77
Mar 22 2018 06:09pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Mar 22 2018 06:46pm)
Well, the skeptical assessment is that Trump is indeed positioning himself for a hardline on the DPRK to strengthen his negotiating hand going into talks. That's what foreign policy analysts have been saying, but to me there's an element of them hoping. The doomsaying view is that Trump has decided to flip to be a warmonger now and both his supporters and opponents are in an uproar saying Trump is gonna start a new Iraq/Afghanistan tomorrow.
I get kind of a chortle every time T_D blows up because they lack faith in their god emperor. The last umpteen times, like 'bannon is out, the globalists win', how did it turn out?


Which foreign policy analysts are those?

Trump already had a NSA who was a hawk on the North Korea issue... I'm not sure how adding an old W Bush hand strengthens their position in negotiations.

Trump doesn't want to start a war... he's just going to make decisions now which make conflict inevitable for the next couple administrations, Iran being the most obvious example.

I know Trump doesn't actually have a solid foreign policy vision, but this pick is perplexing on so many levels. Nobody wants John Bolton advising the president on national security. Well, nobody except the neo-cons who didn't even vote for Trump.

This post was edited by IceMage on Mar 22 2018 06:12pm
Member
Posts: 53,341
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Mar 22 2018 06:10pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 22 Mar 2018 20:04)
are you just pretending to be this uniformed? clinton got impeached over lying under oath, not because of the BJ itself.

commie thinks if he tells a lie enough times it will stick. fender aka heinrich von goebbels’ ancestor joseph believed similarly.
Member
Posts: 52,309
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,404.67
Mar 22 2018 06:35pm
Quote (excellence @ 23 Mar 2018 01:10)
commie thinks if he tells a lie enough times it will stick. fender aka heinrich von goebbels’ ancestor joseph believed similarly.


btw where is he? i havent seen a multi-page long rage essay in over a week.
Member
Posts: 8,075
Joined: Dec 28 2016
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 40%
Mar 22 2018 06:37pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Mar 22 2018 04:35pm)
btw where is he? i havent seen a multi-page long rage essay in over a week.



Last i heard a muslim culturally enriched his house
Member
Posts: 46,672
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 22,164.69
Mar 22 2018 06:43pm
Quote (IceMage @ Mar 22 2018 06:09pm)
Which foreign policy analysts are those?

Trump already had a NSA who was a hawk on the North Korea issue... I'm not sure how adding an old W Bush hand strengthens their position in negotiations.

Trump doesn't want to start a war... he's just going to make decisions now which make conflict inevitable for the next couple administrations, Iran being the most obvious example.

I know Trump doesn't actually have a solid foreign policy vision, but this pick is perplexing on so many levels. Nobody wants John Bolton advising the president on national security. Well, nobody except the neo-cons who didn't even vote for Trump.


whoops yeah I'm getting Tillerson / Pompeo / McMaster / Bolton all goofed up dyslexically I think. Bolton was a harder line than McMaster on Iran, not north korea, and they're going into both in the same month
It was McMaster who was initially hawkish on Iran but still was trying to keep the deal alive, while Bolton was hostile to it. Bolton and Pompeo are basically in lockstep on both of them, while Tillerson/McMaster weren't
have I got that all the right way around?

This post was edited by Goomshill on Mar 22 2018 06:49pm
Member
Posts: 53,359
Joined: Jan 20 2009
Gold: 4,383.11
Mar 22 2018 06:45pm
Quote (excellence @ 23 Mar 2018 01:10)
commie thinks if he tells a lie enough times it will stick. fender aka heinrich von goebbels’ ancestor joseph believed similarly.


Quote (Black XistenZ @ 23 Mar 2018 01:35)
btw where is he? i havent seen a multi-page long rage essay in over a week.


probably has some gender studies exams to prepare for
Member
Posts: 53,341
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Mar 22 2018 06:47pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 22 Mar 2018 20:35)
btw where is he? i havent seen a multi-page long rage essay in over a week.

he’s on trial for teaching his dog to do a certain gesture
Member
Posts: 18,491
Joined: Sep 2 2008
Gold: 0.00
Mar 22 2018 06:54pm
sounds like some more more indictments are expected tomorrow
stay tuned at f5 o'clock
prolly just some ruskies but who knows
this script is so bonkers
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1174317441745174617473169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll