Matthew 22:30 KJV
For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven.

matt25:1-13
Then shall the kingdom of heaven be likened unto ten virgins, which took their lamps, and went forth to meet the bridegroom.
And while they went to buy, the bridegroom came; and they that were ready went in with him to the marriage: and the door was shut.

Obviously this can imply they are married to God not their former partners or each other individually, which makes sense because adam's "marriage" to eve as it were was the original problem in the garden because it allowed adam to indirectly disobey through eve and the devil, the serpent.
I would say god is masculine and thats why he gave man woman, because it "was not good man was alone", but to talk about God as a feminine force even just to apply training in righteousness - then perhaps Ester and or the holy spirit could be topics of discussion in addition.

I only start shitposting threads. This is a serious thread, and I made a serious post. Can you deny that if your God made man in "his" own image, that given that only women can make life, God is a woman?

I'm not qualified to answer this. But I believe based on your own teaching that the Christian god is probably a woman. Can you prove me wrong?

God made life and God made the process that makes life.

Woman makes life, and woman encompasses the process that makes life.

Pretty sure your god is a woman.

its "God" with a capital "G"
I dont think God is human. The scripture, one can interpret it, is God is a energy being.
perhaps male and female is a earthly condition.
but scripture refers to God in the masculine..........but what is biblical masculinity?

scripture is translated from greek (new testament) and hebrew (old testament). when one says "bible study" it can mean a few things.
people argue about which translation. I say several.

You were never right.

I know you're wrong, but i can only provide evidence, in order to prove i'd have to change your mind and heart.

Your assumption is that woman makes life and that life is the flesh or the body, Christian principles state otherwise. The body is not the soul or the spirit or the life housing it. The protein sequencing of the human body & abiogenesis is too fined tuned to be by chance. The probably that life(as the protein based body) is by chance is ten to the 39th and ten to the 41 thousandth power. Not rational to say life is by chance either.

If you disagree then when people who are put on respirators & or in comas - their body should be fine and thus they should be but such is not the case.You'd also have to address the tens of thousands of NDE cases that exemplify mind and body separation upon death or people claiming to be hovering over their bodies when they undergo extensive brain surgeries, etc. with predictive power regarding what they saw to verify their claims.
But even by the vague and primitive implication that flesh is the source of life then man makes life aswell - which is sperm and new protein cells daily.
There is procreation and the source of all creation that allowed for it and that source would be God or the life in christian theology. The closest thing to it physically speaking would be the blood as it is connected to the spirit. This is why Christ said blessed is he who came into existence before he came into existence, and this is how Christ was born in that fashion - the spirit of life was not contingent upon the flesh and thus he was was emmaculate and born in flesh for the forgiveness of sins.

Michael Egnor: The Evidence against Materialism
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BqHrpBPdtSI

Please take the time to read this first post and vote in the poll if you haven't yet.