Quote (Goomshill @ 12 Feb 2018 23:30)
She's knowingly violating the rules after being warned she's in violation of the rules, with the entire point of her stunt to be doing viral political activism.
Everyone other than herself acted reasonably and lawfully, she intentionally disrupted a house hearing just so it could be posted on youtube and shared with deceptive articles.
Of course ss-standartenoberjunker oa fender von heinreich von goebbels can't tell the difference between viral activism and victimhood
it's quite amusing to see you copy the same lazy attacks that my other obsessed fanboys resort to, especially considering the brownshirt mentality you guys are displaying. not surprising that the irony of that is completely lost on you though...
all she did is publicly read out
bribes "campaign contributions" by fossil fuel corporations to lawmakers that will probably vote in favour of
companies drilling on minority mineral owners' land without their consent.
but hey, who cares about that, right? constitutional rights only matter when it fits your agenda, that's not news. someone in power said she wasn't allowed to do that, and that's ofc where the obedient shill begins to spin and paint HER as the bad actor. laughable...