Quote (CPK001 @ Jul 15 2023 12:56pm)
Not only did I use multiple sites as reference but I even used the nationalgeographic site as one of my references. All you did was quote a Wikipedia article, which by the way I can very easily edit right now if I wanted.
Do you see that big edit button on the right hand side of the Wikipedia site? If I scroll down to the bottom I can see that the last edit was merely 3 Months ago. What was changed in the last 3 Months?
Don't you see that the problem doesn't lie with lack of evidence? the problem lies with how you respond when the evidence is presented before you. In your case you responded with an insult and posted the first link you found without going to multiple sources or doing any kind of deep dive.
I am confused. You literally gave me 2 references from Wikipedia. Now you are saying its not credible when same source is used to prove you wrong. It's not insulting to call you ignorant because that's textbook display of ignorance, do facts insult you?
Btw national geographic source you referenced was merely a confirmation that an ancient city "Ur" existed. Records and knowledge of its existence has been available for thousands of years before the bible was ever written. Christians trying to take credit for its discovery is cute. Also this doesn't prove anything merely that the authors included real place in its fantasy story book. Doesn't prove magic or any of the crazy claims the bible makes. Spiderman is based in New York a real city that exists, doesn't mean the story is real also. Get a clue.
On top of that none of your sources claim to be true and original documents, what you got is a collection of copies without any way of knowing they are authentic other than trust.
Do better!