d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Senate Impeachment Trial 2020
Prev11617181920134Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 93,003
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,214.94
Jan 23 2020 01:30pm
Quote (Hecht55 @ Jan 23 2020 11:29am)
Laugh all you want but look at the state of society and tell me we're not getting fucked.


im doing ok
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jan 23 2020 01:33pm
Quote (Hecht55 @ Jan 23 2020 11:29am)
Laugh all you want but look at the state of society and tell me we're not getting fucked.


What do you mean by "state of society"?
Member
Posts: 93,003
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,214.94
Jan 23 2020 01:44pm
Quote (tagged4nothing @ Jan 23 2020 01:25pm)
democrats are in no position to talk about normalcies and precedent. especially coming to the handling of this impeachment.


this is such a double edged sword man......

the gop, who are complaining, did literally the same thing against clinton, with no serious crimes in play, let alone international consequences.

they literally did exactly this for a fucking blowjob. they said "its not presidential", and now they back trump.
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Jan 23 2020 01:54pm
Quote (ThatAlex @ Jan 23 2020 11:12am)
My point is that the GOP's goalposts keep moving.

Not enough Americans support impeachment - not true
No unlawful behavior was actually comitted - not true
Not enough Americans support removal - not true
Not enough Republicans support witnesses in the Senate trial - not true

The GOP is now at the point of saying, well, unlawful behavior was committed, and the President probably did withhold funds from a foreign country to investigate a political opponent, but even though most Americans, including Republicans, want to hear more about all this in the Senate, we don't think it's bad enough to convict and we need to move on.

You guys gonna be cool when AOC holds aid from Syria in 2028 for some dirt on Nikki Haley? Is this the precedent we want to set, or is it just politically convenient at this particular time to do nothing about it?


Of course not, why would they be? Rules for thee and not for me is the cornerstone of the Republican party. If you want to know what the typical GOP voter is like, just look at Ghot. All we can do is step on their throats in 2020 and make sure they never breath again.
Member
Posts: 41,270
Joined: Apr 14 2006
Gold: 1,788.71
Jan 23 2020 01:54pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Jan 23 2020 01:44pm)
this is such a double edged sword man......

the gop, who are complaining, did literally the same thing against clinton, with no serious crimes in play, let alone international consequences.

they literally did exactly this for a fucking blowjob. they said "its not presidential", and now they back trump.



Yeah at this point GOP are spinning themselves in circles for the next election, lot of seats up for grabs and they truly need Trumps approval to have a shot at keeping those seats.

Interesting thing will be in 2024 when trump is done, what do they stand for then? Do they go back to traditional conservatism or what? Just like after Bush’s 8 years where McCain got slaughtered running on same principles. The party has transformed in the last 3 years
Member
Posts: 9,160
Joined: May 11 2009
Gold: 5.01
Jan 23 2020 01:54pm
These percent population numbers in favor/against impeachment are complete bullshit. The majority of the population is not engaged with the affair other than hearing some 'highlights' from their favorite flavor of the day news outlet. Others, tuned in for the house hearings which were a dull affair given the foreplay hype. It is a bit comical everyone gets microfocused on the President slowing war funds to Ukraine. Why do they not focus on controlling how much funds he can spend in the ME shit show war zone? Irony IMO Personally, even if what is alleged is true, it doesn't seem outlandishly out of precedence with former POTUS and their administration. Trump is just sloppy at executing.

Obama was a great executor. Killed US citizen with drones, protected Holder during Fast and Furious. Cracked down a bit on drugs even though PR campaign was promoting the exact opposite message.
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
Jan 23 2020 01:59pm
Quote (ThatAlex @ Jan 23 2020 02:12pm)
My point is that the GOP's goalposts keep moving.

Not enough Americans support impeachment - not true
No unlawful behavior was actually comitted - not true
Not enough Americans support removal - not true
Not enough Republicans support witnesses in the Senate trial - not true

The GOP is now at the point of saying, well, unlawful behavior was committed, and the President probably did withhold funds from a foreign country to investigate a political opponent, but even though most Americans, including Republicans, want to hear more about all this in the Senate, we don't think it's bad enough to convict and we need to move on.

You guys gonna be cool when AOC holds aid from Syria in 2028 for some dirt on Nikki Haley? Is this the precedent we want to set, or is it just politically convenient at this particular time to do nothing about it?


GOP voters are firmly behind the president. That is obviously the only consideration that matters here.

If AOC (who will never be president) is tried in the court of public opinion and found guilty, great, the Democrats will have to make a political calculation and act accordingly.

Republicans don't think this is impeachment worthy, and the partisan manner in which the House investigation was conducted has forced the hand of even the moderate, concerned Republican senators.
Member
Posts: 26,025
Joined: Jun 14 2006
Gold: 5,300.00
Warn: 10%
Jan 23 2020 02:00pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Jan 23 2020 02:44pm)
this is such a double edged sword man......

the gop, who are complaining, did literally the same thing against clinton, with no serious crimes in play, let alone international consequences.

they literally did exactly this for a fucking blowjob. they said "its not presidential", and now they back trump.

it was pretty political yes, if that's your point. impeachments are political.

to be fair to precedent though, there were actual crimes listed in the impeachment articles of Clinton
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starr_Report
Quote
The Starr Report, officially the Referral from Independent Counsel Kenneth W. Starr in Conformity with the Requirement of Title 28, United States Code, Section 595(c), is a United States federal government report by Independent Counsel Ken Starr concerning his investigation of President Bill Clinton. Delivered to the United States Congress on September 9, 1998, the allegations in the report led to the impeachment of Bill Clinton and the five-year suspension of Clinton's law license.

Quote
The Office of the Independent Counsel concluded its four-year-long investigation of the president soon after Clinton's grand jury testimony, and on September 9, 1998, delivered its report to the House Judiciary Committee.

Quote
The long-awaited report cited 11 possible grounds for impeachment in four categories: perjury, obstruction of justice, witness tampering and abuse of power.[2][6] These allegations all arose from President Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky.[7]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton
Quote
The impeachment of Bill Clinton was initiated on October 8, 1998, when the United States House of Representatives voted to commence impeachment proceedings against Bill Clinton, the 42nd president of the United States, for "high crimes and misdemeanors". The specific charges against Clinton were lying under oath and obstruction of justice. The charges stemmed from a sexual harassment lawsuit filed against Clinton by Paula Jones and from Clinton's testimony denying that he had engaged in a sexual relationship with White House intern Monica Lewinsky. The catalyst for the president's impeachment was the Starr Report, a September 1998 report prepared by Independent Counsel Ken Starr for the House Judiciary Committee.[1]

the house hasn't bothered with an independent investigation. they wanted to rush this through so quickly, they didn't even do their own proper investigation.

This post was edited by tagged4nothing on Jan 23 2020 02:02pm
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Jan 23 2020 02:05pm
Quote (bogie160 @ Jan 23 2020 11:59am)
GOP voters are firmly behind the president. That is obviously the only consideration that matters here.

If AOC (who will never be president) is tried in the court of public opinion and found guilty, great, the Democrats will have to make a political calculation and act accordingly.

Republicans don't think this is impeachment worthy, and the partisan manner in which the House investigation was conducted has forced the hand of even the moderate, concerned Republican senators.


Let's be real though. Because the Republicans are firmly behind the President, they have no interest in actually having an actual investigation. It was going to be partisan no matter what. A small portion of the electorate, maybe 30%, is interested in bipartisanship. Everyone else has no interest in the truth or principle, just power.
Member
Posts: 93,003
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,214.94
Jan 23 2020 02:05pm
Quote (tagged4nothing @ Jan 23 2020 02:00pm)
it was pretty political yes, if that's your point. impeachments are political.

to be fair to precedent though, there were actual crimes listed in the impeachment articles of Clinton
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starr_Report



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton

the house hasn't bothered with an independent investigation. they wanted to rush this through so quickly, they didn't even do their own proper investigation.


this investigation is following the exact precedent, minus the independent investigator. and im sure if they followed that path you'd say they're dragging it out and/or you would say the investigator is too biased.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev11617181920134Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll