Quote (thesnipa @ Aug 27 2019 09:46am)
the entire farm issue highlights tribalism. HRC basically calls coal miners collateral damage to her EPA standards, people rally around a group that's like 50k people to call out her callous behavior. Trump then calls farmers collateral damage to his policies and it's not a problem, people are willing to pump up subsidies, take tariff price hikes on the chin, and risk job loss in the farm sector. It's more about the source than anything, far more people are affected by farm job loss than coal mining job loss. and in both sectors increases in demand don't equate to jobs at a 1:1 ratio due to automated work processes. same as the effort to bring iron working jobs back has just resulted in larger production runs in existing plants rather than new plants or reopened plants.
is it collateral damage when he's protecting the farmers?
https://www.npr.org/2018/07/24/631953880/trump-administration-to-provide-farmers-12-billion-to-offset-tariffsthis was his first form of "help". he's promised to be mindful of the farmers throughout this ordeal, so i imagine more governmental help.
another reason why he was pushing japan so hard to buy our corn.
well, if it all goes bad, the farmers can just "learn to code" like the coal miners did.
on a second point. i'm unable to even tell what you and ghot are arguing about.
you on the rag bud?
edit: i haven't read this in full yet, i'm doing so now. seems reasonable to place here though
https://www.dailysignal.com/2018/02/07/family-of-farmers-what-trump-has-done-for-our-industry/This post was edited by tagged4nothing on Aug 27 2019 03:56pm