That doesn't answer the question.

I agree that getting rid of DWS changing nothing. It's just the DNC openly admitting they fucked up and broke the rules.

I'll ask you another time: Do you think the DNC should keep or abolish their rules of neutrality? I'm talking about their rules on the books, not what your definition of neutrality is or should be.

don't care

rules or not it's never been neutral and will never be neutral

wanna know what the level playing field is? technology, these fucks can't hide anything anymore now (very long anyway) it's on the people to fucking vote

not bitch and moan and not vote actually vote and drag their family and friends along as well

ALLLLLLL of these asswipes are voted in and repeatedly by the people and most of them aren't close elections

Don't vote for Hillary idgaf but it's time for people to hold voters accountable and stop bitching and moaning about a "corrupt" system that they keep feeding by reelecting/electing these boogeymen and women

Not the voters' fault the electoral system is broken. The people want Al Gore: GWB wins. The people want Bernie Sanders: Hillary wins.

It's really funny how you don't want to answer a simple question. (Do you think the DNC should keep or abolish their rules of neutrality?)

It feels exactly like last week when we were talking to Trump supporters: "Do you think Melania Trump's speech was plagiarized?"

"It doesn't matter! Everyone plagiarizes! A speech is never going to be completely unique from other speeches!"

Just give a straight answer to the question and face reality. Can't even admit simple facts to yourself - that the DNC broke important rules and should maintain a standard of neutrality. Stop jumping through so many mental hoops and just be real for a second. The DNC chair isn't resigning right before the DNC Convention because everything is fine and dandy.

The system is corrupt and people like you can't even realize that or admit it to yourself when we have definitive proof of said corruption. You refuse to give an answer to a very simple question because it would be an admission of the fact that the DNC broke the rules of neutrality and should maintain neutrality moving forward.

do not care and then my explanation is definitely an answer

You want to post walls over with every post but you want everyone else to simply answer yes or no to your questions

it was plagiarized and it's pretty insignificant other than giving a shitload of media to trump and his wife which is a net positive

We can discuss the net positives or negatives of the situation all we want, but the speech was partially plagiarized and that wasn't something Trump supporters openly admitted during the night everything happened.



You don't have to give a simple yes or no answer. I was just curious what your answer to the question was. Do you think the DNC should be a neutral or abolish their rules of neutrality?

It's not that hard, and you can elaborate upon your answer to the question and provide any context or background all you want. But "don't care" and "humans will never be neutral" aren't answering whether the DNC should or should not have a rule of neutrality on their official books.

I think his answer was pretty clear. He couldn't give a shit.

typical of a hillary supporter not to care about the mountain of flaws but vote anyway because "shes a woman!" or "she's not trump!"