Quote (Beowulf @ 27 Apr 2016 17:23)
You are wanting me to post thousands and thousands of sexist personal attacks from Bernie bros or you are wanting me to show you surrogates using "democratic whore" or bringing up monica lewinsky as a dog whistle?
I find it hard to believe someone that follows politics doesn't know exactly what I am talking about but I guess accepting a strong presence of racism within a movement gives you a pass on sexism?
Just haven't seen the sexism you are referencing. I've seen some racism, but not sexism. And I self-identify as an equity feminist, so I think I tend to pick up on subtle sexism more than average.
It's not surprising to see a Hillary supporter cry sexism, though. What is ironic is that her campaign has been extremely focused on the fact that she is a woman. Her answer to questions about her financial corruption have been either "9/11" or "I'd be the first female president."
When they asked her how she would differ from Obama, she said, "I'd be the first female president." That's technically true, but isn't explaining actual differences between her and Obama or answering the real debate question.
As a feminist, I don't care what gender someone is when it comes to president. I just want the best person for the job. It's insulting to the feminist movement that Hillary has been plugging that she would be the first woman president in almost every rally and tough debate question.
I mean, it's cool she would be the first woman president, but that isn't a reason to vote for her.
You previous complaints of Bernie were somewhat substantive, but I think you should take a different angle other than sexism. Not only is the claim mostly false, but the claim is also about supporters rather than the candidate. Perhaps you didn't know how to respond to my working/middle class criticsms of the political establishment so then thought it was best to go after a criticism of supporters and cry sexism than put forth a substantive response.
This post was edited by ThatAlex on Apr 27 2016 04:31pm