>aluminum
>holographic properties
>mfw

IDK...

Science is hard. Therefore, it must be ignored.

It is well known that H2O in the exhaust of planes leaves white trails behind them. So pictures of white trails is not evidence for chemicals in the sky other than H2O. You will need a lot more than just a photograph...

sheeples do not believe in chem trails? sheeeet here in the Pacific NorthWest its a weekly thing. No conspiracy, its a fact jack...

Right. Love to see your proof, jack. Because "No conspiracy, it's a fact, Jack" doesn't fly. And so far, we haven't seen hard proof in this thread.

iseewatudidthere

I can show you proposed ways to fight global warming ....documented congress bills and lots and lots more you still wont believe or you know and just want too harass us

You are right, that won't be enough to convince us.

We want evidence that there are chemicals in contrails (other than the byproducts of combustion). That is what you guys claim, and that is what we want to see evidence of (before we accept your claims). Everything else is just a red herring.

If I claimed my cow jumped over the moon. You wouldn't accept as evidence: documents that propose ways of getting a cow to jump over the moon. You would want evidence that my cow actually jumped over the moon... Why can't you get this though your head?

This post was edited by Azrad on Mar 30 2013 05:48pm

Probably wont get 1000% proof until mankind devolops a laser guided exhaust analyzer

but until then you just have to asdk yourself wtf are all those planes doing - we need 60 flights every day over a city in order to determine wind pattern?

Really - are you buying the same crappy excuse theyve been pushing?

And we do know that Test on trees over these areas where chemtrails are suspected show a subtaintial rise in these chemicals.

Can we prove its from planes spaying chemicals - hmm well go buy me a 20, 000 foot ladder and I'll get back to you.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Mar 31 2013 11:01pm