If you came to these forums for intellectual discussions you are doing it wrong.

Calm down you moron. I don't know what biochemical systems are and I wasn't even serious to begin with. Biological systems theory require math? Great. I don't give a fuck.

and no, my degree will require more mathematics than yours. These are just the facts of the matter. Go cry in a corner.

This post was edited by Phils_Porsche on May 23 2010 12:49pm

Yes, they do. Population growth models rely on those quite a bit. This falls under anthropology.

sounds unexciting

It's one of those things that is cool for a couple days and then you realize that if you did it for the rest of your life, you would hate yourself.

anyone who doesn't major in physics/ engineering, math or computer science is a dunce.

these are just the facts of the matter

The number of journals out there that support your argument mean nothing if they are all wrong. They are controlled by the government so of course there would be thousands of scientific journals available out there. I think you and I can agree on one thing: the corruption of the government. Unfortunately you do not realize that you've also been affected by the lies of the government. You believe in evolution because that was what you were taught ever since you first began kindergarten years ago. Try thinking outside the box. I believe my argument has plenty of evidence. More than plenty.

edit: Oh by the way, if you want to use your "thousands of peer reviewed scientific journals" argument as backup for your beliefs, then maybe you should consider this: the single best selling book in the world is the Bible. Now what?

If "NOTHING" is the most entropic ultimate symmetrical state then it would be plausible to say that "SOMETHING" cannot come from nothing without an input of energy of some sort. Perhaps the input of energy came from a diety of some sort. Some atheists would argue that there was never a nothing to begin with and that something already had existed that caused the big bang. Isn't that the same logic that creationists have that GOD already existed?

No, the notion that the universe has always existed coincides with science in an abstract sense.

The notion of God, and of God having always existed etc. does not.

This post was edited by Handcuffs on Jun 5 2010 09:34am