>" But hey, at least we're educated and can have dozens of sex partners without consequences or strings attached. #progress."
> "My argument is clearly based on adequate replacement rates,"





This post was edited by SBD on Jan 18 2024 11:59am

Good job on ignoring the meat and potatoes of my response and fixating on the last few words.

Because often people will blab on about something and then there actual hidden motive just shines through in only a few words.

Pretty common when people are pretending.

You're swinging at phantoms and just continue to put words in my mouth. I clearly want to revoke women's right to vote am I right?

I quoted you directly, that's not putting words in your mouth. You just cant contain what comes out of your mouth.

Where did you quote me directly where I wished to take women's voting rights or called them whores? Those are your words my dude.

why not kill two twins with one vacuum here?

get an legal abortion, but you're disqualified from ever collecting social security. solve two issues at once here.

>" But hey, at least we're educated and can have dozens of sex partners without consequences or strings attached. #progress."
> "My argument is clearly based on adequate replacement rates,"

You damn yourself with dishonesty. Its the same when I brought up most of the worst except the least educated places are pro-abortion and you reply with yeah because of religion. Well of course, most of those places have the poorest literacy rates in the world, hence why religion remains so popular in places like Africa and South America while its died in the West.

Its just so dishonest.

pointless semantics going on here. if you're going to point out (rightfully in many cases) that the abortion rights push is to preserve people from consequences of meaningless sex with a high number of partners, you can't then get pissy when you're paraphrased calling these people "whores". that's the textbook definition of what a whore is, someone who has a lot of sex with a lot of people.

If that's what you want as your centre stance, so be it but don't go on about how you're on some pedestal about how you are for the betterment and longevity of society because of human replacement rates and you don't want to see the eventual demise and collapse because of negative population growth.

I think most pro-abortionist's own it. There's some that are a total copout and just talk about health, but most I think just want people to understand they don't get to control the actions of another body. I'd say the majority own that. Then you can delve down the old rabbit hole about health costs and things but that's a pretty interesting one to start jumping down given all the other things in life we keep legal.

This post was edited by SBD on Jan 18 2024 12:32pm