yeah that user is just another example of wasted lefty privilege. can’t read or spell lmfao



yeah we know you swallow the (D) messaging without question. “Anyone i dont like is a faux news viewer” lmao you’re just another waste of lefty privilege, pathetic..

yeah boohoo he insulted people back who insulted and lashed at him and his supporters unprovoked first. rest of your rage essay is laughably misplaced as usual

This post was edited by excellence on Jun 1 2019 11:58am

not surprised

I am. In a report that exhaustive and under so much deliberation, trying to get away with cheap editing tricks seems very blatant. Did they figure nobody would see the transcript and be able to note the missing lines?
only the presence of Andrew "Yellow Highlighter" Weissmann on the team makes that understandable

i noticed goom post a portion of this, but i didn't notice a full transcript listed.
i'll list it since CBS isn't playing the full interview on their YT channel.

https://www.newstalkz.com/2019/05/31/william-barr-interview-read-the-full-transcript/

Essentially everyone who watches it believes it

Some people still believe their fake debunk attempt for the planned parenthood videos

For context, this is a voicemail from Dowd after Flynn withdrew from the Joint Defense Agreement, and after Flynn's lawyers informed Dowd that Flynn couldn't have confidential communications with the White House or President.

What national security issue is Dowd talking about? Lol... it seems like an obvious pretext to improperly receive information. Cutting out some of the text seems unnecessary, but I don't see how anyone can read Dowd's voicemail as anything but an attempt to get Flynn to provide information that would benefit the president.

Also for context, Flynn's lawyers called Dowd back and reiterated that they couldn't have confidential communications with him or Trump, and Dowd was "indignant and vocal in his disagreement". Swampy lawyer is swampy.




It's funny how Trump cultists have to treat him like a toddler to justify his ridiculous behavior. But I'm glad we can both agree he's a complete embarrassment to himself and the country.

This post was edited by IceMage on Jun 2 2019 07:53pm

Loretta Lynch, Comey, and now Mueller Lite take the cake for that after their whole story came out.

Seems like a pretty dang relevant bit of text that they edited out, where he specifies 'not' confidential information.



Same national security issue I've been harping on about for years: That it was sensitive diplomacy during a slapfight between the incoming and outgoing administrations and thus involved high level national security with Russia.
Mueller's team and the DoJ in general aren't able to interfere in diplomatic or intelligence concerns. They don't have the excuse of legitimacy a president-elect has, its simply not their area to begin with.
We've had 2 years of strained relations with Russia that have chalked up largely to the Mueller probe and democrats screeching about collusion, its not hard to see how our national security has been affected

Its pretty abundantly clear that Flynn was operating on behalf of Trump, almost certainly with his authorization given that they've never really denied that, have they? The degree to which Flynn was going to talk about the back channel to Russia and Trump's involvement could jeopardize a lot more than any preposterously frivolous Logan Act theories. The legal and ethical cases were in grey areas, the effects on our national security and public discourse were black and white- having the DoJ open that can of words could only make things worse.

we get it you have a life filled with shame and regret for voting for losers unable to beat drumpf and then believing mueller would “get drumpf this time” so you misinterpret people’s posts on purpose.

it really is a good thing you ducked your own bet like a coward, feel free to report more of my posts too you sissie privileged lefty

It is relevant, but I'm having trouble seeing the hypothetical scenario where Flynn is communicating nonconfidential information that has national security implications. If Trump directed Flynn to reachout to Russia on sanctions during the transition, which Mueller couldn't establish, then Trump already knew it. Why would they need a heads up? Are they making the assumption that Flynn would be lying to Mueller's team?

It seems to me to be an obvious attempt to get their stories straight, which is improper, regardless of whether Dowd threw some half-hearted lawyerly disclaimers in.



That bet really triggered you. If you weren't such a coward you'd have gotten some FG from me.

This post was edited by IceMage on Jun 3 2019 07:10am