d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Trump 2016 > Trump Vs Clinton
Prev1165216531654165516563169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 285.00
Jan 27 2018 11:44am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jan 27 2018 12:28pm)
german state TV artificially ramped up the boos in a report about trumps speech in davos, while their reporters aggressively critized trump for talking about "fake news" and "unfair media":

https://www.welt.de/vermischtes/article172917293/ARD-Nachrichtensendung-Tagesschau-drehte-Buhrufe-fuer-Trump-etwas-lauter.html


sad.
so SAD!


:rofl: :wallbash:


Was he talking about his fake news narrative around intelligent adults though? Because he is just asking for criticism when he does that. Takes himself right out of the grown ups table.
Member
Posts: 52,297
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,404.67
Jan 27 2018 11:56am
Quote (Skinned @ 27 Jan 2018 18:44)
Was he talking about his fake news narrative around intelligent adults though? Because he is just asking for criticism when he does that. Takes himself right out of the grown ups table.


and the media proves his talking points of "unfair media" wrong by artificially increasing the volume of the boos from the audience, right?
Member
Posts: 53,359
Joined: Jan 20 2009
Gold: 4,383.11
Jan 27 2018 12:41pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 27 Jan 2018 18:28)
german state TV artificially ramped up the boos in a report about trumps speech in davos, while their reporters aggressively critized trump for talking about "fake news" and "unfair media":

https://www.welt.de/vermischtes/article172917293/ARD-Nachrichtensendung-Tagesschau-drehte-Buhrufe-fuer-Trump-etwas-lauter.html


sad.
so SAD!


:rofl: :wallbash:


public broadcasting in germany has become a disgrace, propaganda and manipulation everywhere and they fully know that dozends of millions of germans get their news exclusively from them
outright fake news, news that dont fit the agenda will simply be ignored until public pressure kicks in
it took them DAYS to inform the country on the new years eve outrages in germany and much more, just for those who dont know

and to make it even worse all households have to pay for this.....guys like honecker from the former socialist, eastern german state would be proud :lol:

i always wonder at which point they abandoned spreading information in favour of spreading a leftist agenda for queen merkel

they are the last people to accuse trump of fake news, that much is for sure :lol:
Member
Posts: 16,621
Joined: Jan 7 2017
Gold: 90.58
Jan 27 2018 02:11pm
Quote (ampoo @ Jan 27 2018 10:41am)
public broadcasting in germany has become a disgrace, propaganda and manipulation everywhere and they fully know that dozends of millions of germans get their news exclusively from them
outright fake news, news that dont fit the agenda will simply be ignored until public pressure kicks in
it took them DAYS to inform the country on the new years eve outrages in germany and much more, just for those who dont know

and to make it even worse all households have to pay for this.....guys like honecker from the former socialist, eastern german state would be proud :lol:

i always wonder at which point they abandoned spreading information in favour of spreading a leftist agenda for queen merkel

they are the last people to accuse trump of fake news, that much is for sure :lol:


where is fender when u need him
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Jan 27 2018 05:24pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 27 Jan 2018 18:28)
german state TV artificially ramped up the boos in a report about trumps speech in davos, while their reporters aggressively critized trump for talking about "fake news" and "unfair media":

https://www.welt.de/vermischtes/article172917293/ARD-Nachrichtensendung-Tagesschau-drehte-Buhrufe-fuer-Trump-etwas-lauter.html


sad.
so SAD!


:rofl: :wallbash:


meanwhile in reality: they enhanced the sound at the end so you could hear the crowd's REACTION in general because mics were not picking up the atmosphere.
they did NOT edit out applause or approval, they did NOT add boos or disapproval, they merely made it possible to hear the crowd's reaction - but ofc the people who only consume right wing propaganda cry foul and suspect conspiracies everywhere.

but hey, giving their viewers a chance to hear what the actual reaction in the audience was hurts their feelings, and since they can't deal with it they just call it "fake". on the other hand, a man trying to systematically delegitimise any critical outlet, while lying like no american president before him, is just "fine". i guess that's how you see the world if you're fully committed to your propaganda's narrative...

no wonder our resident nazi party supporters fully embrace it though...

This post was edited by fender on Jan 27 2018 05:24pm
Member
Posts: 53,340
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Jan 27 2018 05:30pm
Quote (fender @ 27 Jan 2018 19:24)
no wonder our resident nazi party supporters fully embrace it though...

says fender aka heinrich von goebbels, the hateful bigot who is a descendant of joseph, who went on a rant about how everyone else should interact with jewish people :unsure: :huh:
Member
Posts: 40,833
Joined: Sep 17 2011
Gold: 0.00
Jan 27 2018 05:32pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 27 Jan 2018 17:56)
and the media proves his talking points of "unfair media" wrong by artificially increasing the volume of the boos from the audience, right?


They increased the volume of the entire audience. Cheers, boos and applause.

There is no need to alter footage of Trump to make him look like a twat. He does a brilliant job of that all by himself.
Member
Posts: 53,359
Joined: Jan 20 2009
Gold: 4,383.11
Jan 27 2018 06:25pm
This post is a violation of the site rules and appropriate action was taken.

some people really find a way to always twist reality in a way that suits them

well done again mister fenderp

Quote (fender @ 28 Jan 2018 00:24)
meanwhile in reality: they enhanced the sound at the end so you could hear the crowd's REACTION in general because mics were not picking up the atmosphere.
they did NOT edit out applause or approval, they did NOT add boos or disapproval, they merely made it possible to hear the crowd's reaction - but ofc the people who only consume right wing propaganda cry foul and suspect conspiracies everywhere.

but hey, giving their viewers a chance to hear what the actual reaction in the audience was hurts their feelings, and since they can't deal with it they just call it "fake". on the other hand, a man trying to systematically delegitimise any critical outlet, while lying like no american president before him, is just "fine". i guess that's how you see the world if you're fully committed to your propaganda's narrative...

no wonder our resident nazi party supporters fully embrace it though...


it was reported in the mainstream media, just saying
are you really that stupid?

they have deliberately created the impression that trump received significant boos when he didnt, how about simply showing the original footage? is that too much to ask?

its called democracy you fucking moron, just what kind of obsession do you have :lol:
not like i expected anything else from a guy who swallows and repeats the mainstream like a trained monkey

This post was edited by ampoo on Jan 27 2018 06:29pm
Member
Posts: 46,665
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 22,164.69
Jan 27 2018 08:33pm
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/white-house-counsel-don-mcgahn-threatened-to-resign-in-june/?ftag=CNM-00-10aac3a

for fucks sake, here we go again

Quote
White House counsel Don McGahn threatened to resign from his position in June 2017-- but it was not in direct response to President Trump's discussion of firing newly appointed special counsel Robert Mueller. Two sources directly involved in the deliberations tell CBS News chief White House correspondent Major Garrett that McGahn's threat was not communicated directly to Mr. Trump, but adjudicated by senior staff, principally then-chief of staff Reince Priebus and then-chief strategist Steve Bannon.
Garrett reports that while Mr. Trump talked about firing Mueller, he never issued a direct "order" to do so in any written form, although he did say he favored it in the presence of senior staff.
Soon after Mueller's appointment, Mr. Trump raised three possible conflict of interest areas for the special counsel. The president expressed confusion and anger over these areas as well as the general scope of Mueller's investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
Sources tell Garrett that White House senior staff viewed Mr. Trump's talk of firing Mueller skeptically, as he frequently mentioned firing people in his administration, but often quickly forgets about it.
In the Mueller instance, as in other potential firing cases, senior staff acknowledged the president with nods, but did not take action, in hopes Mr. Trump would simmer down or forget, sources tell Garrett.
Because of this, discussion of firing Mueller was not acted upon or elevated from the White House to Department of Justice.
McGahn, other White House counsel attorneys, and other senior staff talked Mr. Trump to back off the notion of firing Mueller based on the risks involved and the lack of legal basis to oust the special counsel.
Sources tell Garrett that McGahn threatened to resign over an accumulation of stresses and frustrations with the president, rather than leaving for issues related to Mueller's potential firing.
McGahn's primary stress was being a "no" voice for Mr. Trump. He served as the the principle lawyerly voice intervening to explain legal limits to Mr. Trump about his various intentions or desires. This role put McGahn at uneasy odds with Mr. Trump.
McGahn did not threaten to resign to Mr. Trump, but communicated this frustration, and others brought to a head by the Mueller situation, to senior staff-- primarily Priebus and Bannon.
In response to McGahn's complaints, more White House Counsel lawyers were brought into interactions with Mr. Trump. Legal advice would then be communicated to Mr. Trump through Preibus and eventually, through current White House chief of staff John Kelly.
With the beginning of Mueller's investigation, McGahn became a figure in the firing of former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn and FBI Director James Comey. That meant McGahn had to severely limit interactions with Mr. Trump, a practice he has adhered to since, sources tell Garrett.
Other advisers and attorneys, including Ty Cobb, John Dowd and Jay Sekulow, have successfully persuaded Mr. Trump to back off from Mueller. Discussion of firing the special counsel quickly died down.
Since late December, Mr. Trump has allowed Cobb, Dowd, and Sekulow to negotiate on a Trump-Mueller interview.
Member
Posts: 77,670
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 500.00
Jan 27 2018 08:35pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jan 27 2018 12:28pm)
german state TV artificially ramped up the boos in a report about trumps speech in davos, while their reporters aggressively critized trump for talking about "fake news" and "unfair media":

https://www.welt.de/vermischtes/article172917293/ARD-Nachrichtensendung-Tagesschau-drehte-Buhrufe-fuer-Trump-etwas-lauter.html


sad.
so SAD!


:rofl: :wallbash:


ground breaking audio engineering feats, they managed to isolate and amplify the boo's in the crowd eh? so it wasn't like the crowd as a whole was booing him
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1165216531654165516563169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll