d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > The Mueller Report
Prev1164165166167168173Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,299.69
May 31 2019 12:31pm
Quote (bogie160 @ May 31 2019 11:28am)
The party's nominee for president in 2016 expressed extreme dismay when restrictions on 3rd trimester abortions were upheld by the SC court, are you saying she was out of line? How about our Virginia Democrats, who just pushed for the same? Admittedly, I might have missed it, but I don't recall any Democrat of note who came out against it.

I'm happy to look up the major contenders this year and show the same. I'm at work, but a quick glance at my news feed tells me that Beto makes the list.


or you could throw down some sources that get anywhere near your estimate

not sure even the rightiest of the right wing websites will have articles stretching it that far but maybe you'll get lucky
Member
Posts: 1,775
Joined: Feb 2 2017
Gold: 945.00
May 31 2019 12:36pm
Quote (bogie160 @ May 31 2019 07:28pm)
The party's nominee for president in 2016 expressed extreme dismay when restrictions on 3rd trimester abortions were upheld by the SC court, are you saying she was out of line? How about our Virginia Democrats, who just pushed for the same? Admittedly, I might have missed it, but I don't recall any Democrat of note who came out against it.

I'm happy to look up the major contenders this year and show the same. I'm at work, but a quick glance at my news feed tells me that Beto makes the list.


Think I found the part of the disinformations on this :D

"Late-term abortion is a phrase used by abortion opponents to refer to abortions performed after about 21 weeks of pregnancy. It is not the same as the medical definition obstetricians use for “late-term,” which refers to pregnancies that extend past a woman’s due date, meaning about 41 or 42 weeks. Contrary to Mr. Trump’s claim, late-term abortions do not allow “a baby to be ripped from the mother’s womb moments before birth.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/06/health/late-term-abortion-trump.html?module=inline

"Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion, said that abortion should be allowed until the time a fetus could survive outside the womb, a point (known as viability) that medical science generally considers to be at about 24 weeks of pregnancy. The Court has also specified that abortion should be legal after viability in certain cases — if continuing the pregnancy would seriously threaten the woman’s life or health."

This post was edited by Knoppie on May 31 2019 12:38pm
Member
Posts: 27,152
Joined: Mar 11 2016
Gold: 9.77
Warn: 10%
May 31 2019 12:38pm
Quote (bogie160 @ 31 May 2019 14:28)
The party's nominee for president in 2016 expressed extreme dismay when restrictions on 3rd trimester abortions were upheld by the SC court, are you saying she was out of line? How about our Virginia Democrats, who just pushed for the same? Admittedly, I might have missed it, but I don't recall any Democrat of note who came out against it.

I'm happy to look up the major contenders this year and show the same. I'm at work, but a quick glance at my news feed tells me that Beto makes the list.



Well considering there are over 200k Dem elected officials and you say almost all (lets say 80% for your benefit)

then ya, lets see data showing that 'almost all' dems said that.

Right now you are at well, 0, because nothing is cited... so just about 160k more to go gl.

Or are you just going off of what one person said and using that to reflect against ones entire political affiliation? I implore you to answer no considering the juxtapositions The Republican leader is creating right now on the basis of political identity for everyone in the US.

This post was edited by Phaggot on May 31 2019 12:38pm
Member
Posts: 92,984
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
May 31 2019 12:39pm
Quote (bogie160 @ May 31 2019 12:28pm)
The party's nominee for president in 2016 expressed extreme dismay when restrictions on 3rd trimester abortions were upheld by the SC court, are you saying she was out of line? How about our Virginia Democrats, who just pushed for the same? Admittedly, I might have missed it, but I don't recall any Democrat of note who came out against it.

I'm happy to look up the major contenders this year and show the same. I'm at work, but a quick glance at my news feed tells me that Beto makes the list.


someone says ban bump stocks: "THIS IS HOW IT STARTS BOYS, SLIPPERY SLOPE. DON'T GIVE ONE INCH"

someone questions ban on 3rd trimester abortions: "the majority support this"

did u ever think that leftist pols just question anything on the hot button topic in the same way the right wing politicians question anything on hte hot button gun issue? without either side's constituency being in support of the extreme measure that's being discussed?
Member
Posts: 105,141
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
May 31 2019 12:53pm
Quote (Knoppie @ May 31 2019 02:36pm)
Think I found the part of the disinformations on this :D

"Late-term abortion is a phrase used by abortion opponents to refer to abortions performed after about 21 weeks of pregnancy. It is not the same as the medical definition obstetricians use for “late-term,” which refers to pregnancies that extend past a woman’s due date, meaning about 41 or 42 weeks. Contrary to Mr. Trump’s claim, late-term abortions do not allow “a baby to be ripped from the mother’s womb moments before birth.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/06/health/late-term-abortion-trump.html?module=inline

"Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion, said that abortion should be allowed until the time a fetus could survive outside the womb, a point (known as viability) that medical science generally considers to be at about 24 weeks of pregnancy. The Court has also specified that abortion should be legal after viability in certain cases — if continuing the pregnancy would seriously threaten the woman’s life or health."




Roe vs. Wade was a serious error in judgement.



/e I'd argue that you could abort the baby any time if the mother's life was in danger. But without a life threatening reason, abortion is just legalized murder.

This post was edited by Ghot on May 31 2019 12:55pm
Member
Posts: 1,775
Joined: Feb 2 2017
Gold: 945.00
May 31 2019 01:06pm
Quote (Ghot @ May 31 2019 07:53pm)
Roe vs. Wade was a serious error in judgement.



/e I'd argue that you could abort the baby any time if the mother's life was in danger. But without a life threatening reason, abortion is just legalized murder.


^^ Nice to see you agreeing on most of the 3rd term abortions that are taking place. Don't think we'll reach a common ground on 21-24 months line, so there it not much reason to engage that part :D

Quote (inkanddagger @ May 31 2019 08:06pm)
How does one murder a parasitic nonhuman?


lol.. hf with Ghot logic

This post was edited by Knoppie on May 31 2019 01:12pm
Member
Posts: 61,688
Joined: Mar 14 2006
Gold: 28.77
May 31 2019 01:06pm
Quote (Ghot @ May 31 2019 11:53am)
Roe vs. Wade was a serious error in judgement.



/e I'd argue that you could abort the baby any time if the mother's life was in danger. But without a life threatening reason, abortion is just legalized murder.



How does one murder a parasitic nonhuman?

This post was edited by inkanddagger on May 31 2019 01:06pm
Member
Posts: 105,141
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
May 31 2019 01:14pm
Quote (Knoppie @ May 31 2019 03:06pm)
^^ Nice to see you agreeing on most of the 3rd term abortions that are taking place. Don't think we'll reach a common ground on 21-24 months line, so there it not much reason to engage that part :D



lol.. hf with Ghot logic


Quote (inkanddagger @ May 31 2019 03:06pm)
How does one murder a parasitic nonhuman?




Roe vs. Wade rewards irresponsible people by allowing them to kill their mistakes. The only parasitic humans I know of... support Roe vs. Wade














This post was edited by Ghot on May 31 2019 01:44pm
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
May 31 2019 01:18pm
Quote (Phaggot @ May 31 2019 01:38pm)
Well considering there are over 200k Dem elected officials and you say almost all (lets say 80% for your benefit)

then ya, lets see data showing that 'almost all' dems said that.

Right now you are at well, 0, because nothing is cited... so just about 160k more to go gl.

Or are you just going off of what one person said and using that to reflect against ones entire political affiliation? I implore you to answer no considering the juxtapositions The Republican leader is creating right now on the basis of political identity for everyone in the US.


What a pedant.

"Let's ignore that all major contenders for party leader, as well as the former leader, support this position. They obviously don't represent the party, despite representing the party. I want a signed confession by every local dem politician, including the ones without social media!"

Stop being ridiculous.
Member
Posts: 105,141
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
May 31 2019 01:40pm








Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1164165166167168173Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll