@VH you continue to misunderstand what supply and demand is, and hows its effected by additional cost mandates and price controls.
There is infact a different demand for labor at different prices. If you raise the minimum wage you will see the demand for low-skill labor fall, disproportionately harming the unskilled and inexperienced, many of which are disproportionately minorities.
A $15 minimum wage or god-forbid a $22 one that Elizabeth Warren was pushing would be very harmful to their job prospects.
Do you still think black people who oppose outlawing jobs for some poor black people are race traitors?
Your implication that opening new businesses or expanding them "lowers" or worsens the economy is patently false.
Nor would competing with other businesses be a bad thing.
Nor would wage rates crash like you think they would. Something simply being legally allowed to be sold at a certain price does not mean that will become the norm.
Right now around ~97% of people with jobs make more than minimum wage. Not because the law says so, but because there is a demand for that labor and employers have to pay them more to get them to work there. They are productive and the product of their work is worth something to other people.
You are choking the demand for labor and then complaining to my side that theres not enough of it as an excuse to raise price floors even more.
Quote (Skinned @ Mar 16 2015 01:20pm)
Can the Norman Conquest be considered a hardship faced by white people when it was a hardship perpetuated by white people? Unless we're going by the Aryan notion that the farther North in Europe you are, the whiter you become. Real Aryans live on the North Pole. Nobody really missed the Hapsburg Dynasty....just think of them as a modern Lehman Brothers...it is appropriate, since banks are the royalty of today (because of the worship of Money)....and again, the Hapsburg Dynasty largely fell because of internal problems after a long decline and the murder of the heir (by a white fellow) while Lehman Brothers fell largely due to moral hazard being reintroduced to the markets by regulation that allowed the people who own the banks to own the insurance company (AIG) that overinsured their junk bonds, because fuck it, nobody was checking.. Napoleonic and Czarist Adventurism wasn't a racial thing, those were empire things....and the Russians don't need any certificate from anyone about their Czar, as they seemed to deal with them quite effectively and permanently. The French seem to have done pretty well for themselves, and if we are going by the Norman Conquest logic, they aren't very white anyway.
Great hardships and oppression only count if you deem them racist?
Not all people of a race have to face a hardship for it to be a hardship either.
And since they weren't purely racist events, should people continue to act like "damn fools" when dealing with black people?
This post was edited by cambovenzi on Mar 17 2015 02:35am