Quote (duffman316 @ Jan 12 2018 10:57pm)
Compared to the thinkprogress/shareblue nonsense, it appears like their M.O. is to (generally) post factually accurate headlines when it concerns Trump/etc and make sure they identify source of statements/reports rather than making it their own words, but when it comes to democrats they open up the usual barrage of hackery. Going through that list of headlines, and ignoring the article (because nobody reads those), we have;
>Devin Nunes To Unveil Proof of Reported Illegal Surveillance by FBI & DOJ Officials on Trump
Yup, that's what Nunes says he is doing, and while it may be stretching Nunes's claims of 'abuse' into 'illegal surveillance', thats a stretch Nunes himself makes all the time as a republican partisan hack. I give it an 8/10
>Feds File First Russian Uranium-Linked Indictment: Bribery, Money Laundering, Kickbacks
This would be a completely accurate headline if it wasn't for the quibble that technically the feds already had indictments years ago silently, and these are the first indictments since the scandal became public. I give it a 9/10
>MSM HOAX: Trump Lawyer, former porn star deny ‘hush money’ claims
They combine the accurate reporting on the denial with their own capital letters denouncing it as a hoax, inserting their bias, and being factually incorrect- this story is not the product of a hoax. I give it a 5/10
>DOJ Prosecutor: Comey, McCabe, Lynch, Yates Waged Stealth Plot to Destroy Trump
Not even fucking close, Horowitz has made none of the allegations they are attributing to him, his investigation hasn't made such claims yet. He is, however, actually investigating these things at least. I give it a 3/10
>2 GOP senators in Trump meeting say they don’t recall ‘shithole’ comment
That's exactly what they said, whether its true or not, its being reported accurately. I give it a 10/10