I don't like the WEF

People are completely right about the WEF

McCarthy is quite good, I would vote him for speaker, something is going on here with the voter holdouts, perhaps they are making re-litigating the 2020 election as a condition for their vote

classic fenderp

[x] doubt


Yes, quite aware.

Imagine if I threw up my hands and said "Koch who? sounds like a qanon conspiracy!" and insisted they are just some guys like any other.



This is perhaps mostly irrelevant and I disagree on the extent that its the free market deciding which energy is used, but we have some common ground here.



My life and worldview do not revolve around michael walsh and what he opposes. Forget Michael Walsh. This isn't about him.
The fact that he is supposedly a right wing writer that you really don't like means nothing.
It certainly does not mean the WEF is no big deal.
As many people often do, you are more concerned with who is supporting something rather than the content of the issue.

I think about what is true and what is right and wrong.



This is very naive and woefully underestimating a group of extremely powerful and wealthy people with a sinister agenda.. a group you weren't aware existed until today, apparently.

'There are right wing groups too!' - There is no equivalency between the kochs or heritage and the WEF.
Bringing them up does not really address the points we were talking about nor does it make you any more aware of the WEF and qualified to dismiss them as just some lobbying group with a qanon-level conspiracy about them.

McCarthy is rightly seen as an establishment swamp creature and a business as usual guy. He is also endorsed by Trump.
Many of these people were elected because people wanted change. Less spending and more freedom.

They should just elect a guy who is ok with increasing the trillions and trillions of government spending.. to save money!

They only pretend to care about spending when something is happening that they don't like. A government 'shutdown', a stalled speaker vote. etc.
The act of opposing our fiscal irresponsibility is fiscally irresponsible! ..So do what we want

This post was edited by cambovenzi on Jan 4 2023 03:07pm

mccarthy sold out to the dems saying jan 6th was an insurrection. that why fraud lefties want him so much why they puttin up bich threads on jsp
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEEEEAAAAMMMMMMMMM LOL watch this
Boebert goes after Trump for his support for McCarthy


HAHAHAHA some one calling him McRhino

This post was edited by TiStuff on Jan 4 2023 03:57pm

Universal healthcare is a "sinister" agenda? I think they got you man... You may not agree with their agenda, but calling it sinister is more than stretching the truth.



I was not trying to create false equivalency. I am trying to paint the picture that the media goes through a back and forth type of exchange with the material they publish and I am just explaining to you what is going on there. You're correct in the sense that each of those organizations is completely unique. It's pretty easy for me to dismiss it because it's clearly not true and if you are worried about it, then maybe you should be more concerned about something that could actually affect you, like the arsenic and mercury levels in the food you eat. The WEF is a pretty weird "boogeyman" to be worried about.

Lol as if democrats don’t waste fully spend… the don’t change definitions of words such as recession or the definition of what a vaccine is. Very communist, no surprise to be honest… considering they’re the party of the KKK. my shocked face

The dixiecrats that were responsible for the KKK would be modern day republicans.

As a reminder: Conservatism just means people who favor traditional values and liberalism is just people who favor innovation in society. So yeah, at some point in time, forming an organization like the KKK would be considered to be a "liberal action." African people used to be slaves in the US, so moving away from that and towards organizations like the KKK would not be "traditional." Obviously the oldest piece of "traditionalism" is the Bible in the US and Christians were generally fine with slavery at the time.

Also, the political parties in the US do not squarely align with all republicans being conservatives and all democrats being liberal. There certainly are conservative democrats (Joe Manchin) and liberal republicans (Susan Collins), granted it's less common.

There's all sorts of examples of this type of stuff in US history, like the Liberal Republican party who actively supported Democrats.

Also, most republicans support liberal thinking in fields outside of politics: The US economic system is called neoliberalism, which is a highly innovative form of free market capitalism.

Edit: Fiscal conservatism, which is a financial concept that I strongly agree with, simply means reducing government spending and then reducing taxes. The concept is that it keeps inflation low, so if you are the saver type of person, the money you have safely in the bank is not experiencing a drop in buying power over time due to inflation. If the government has enough revenue from taxes, it doesn't need the federal reserve to add new money to the money supply, which preserves the scarcity of the US dollar.

This post was edited by mki on Jan 4 2023 03:58pm

I stopped reading after Dixiecrats 🤧 bc just like changing definitions on words such as vaccines and recession done by the left is why I stopped reading bc you’ve been fooled. We’ve had enough talks for me to know you don’t know history frrrrrrp