Durham report

Justice needs to be served

Lock um up!

the faux news npcs at it again. nobody watching that propaganda channel should ever be taken seriously...

Sucks to see that faux Russia hoax unraveleling huh

Scummy leftist MSM looking the other way after 4 years of non-stop coverage of this says it all, lol

lol

^^

So this is actually the most direct link of Hillary spying on Trump revealed yet, right?

With the Steele Dossier story, it was Hillary's operatives trying to dredge up dirt on Trump via Kremlin sources, which could be argued as collusion with Russia but was not spying on Trump. It was dirty tricks, and passing it off to the FBI with lies was illegal, but it wasn't spying. The Crossfire Hurricane and unmasking stories, while exposing that Trump was spied upon directly and even his cabinet targeted in hilariously dumb sting operations, was done by outsourcing Hillary's dirty work to the DoJ/FBI. It was government officials who held either political sympathies or their own political self-interest that spied on Trump, not Hillary or her operatives. So again, it wasn't Hillary actually spying on Trump. You can't really distinguish between "biased political actors in the FBI leaking Trump info to suit their own whims" from "conspiring with Clinton to sanitize her spying on Trump by using the FBI to do it". From the start of the McCabe/Comey/Strzok saga, you can't disentangle motives or establish collusion, you can only show the systemic corruption and bad faith actors at the FBI clearly violating both the law and their professional obligations. Like Clinton's black box foundation, you can't put her fingerprints on it.

This story, however, is actually Hillary spying on Trump. Her operatives hacked his internet connection at a DNS level and reported it back to Hillary and tried to spin it into a Russiaburger storyline to no avail, even trying to pass it off to the FBI to drum up more investigations like they did with the Steele Dossier. And notably, they kept spying on him after he took the White House, meaning they were directly spying on the sitting President of the United States of America.

Granted there's only so far DNS monitoring can get you. You can't read the contents, and assuming anyone was using encryption without a backdoor as we'd hope all normal protocols are, it was little more than reading the addresses on letters in someone's mailbox without opening them.
But its clearly hacking someone to spy on them, and the same DoJ that is trying to prosecute Julian Assange for merely stating that he would try to find someone to guess passwords to an encrypted file Bradley Manning gave him, can't pretend its not illegal access to a secure computer network when Rodney Joffe gave Hillary's campaign direct access to secure EOP servers to spy on DNS lookups made by the White House, Trump Tower and Trump's apartment.

This post was edited by Goomshill on Feb 14 2022 07:14am

and the counterargument would be that Rodney Joffe was himself a self-interested independent actor, not operating on orders from Hillary's campaign but instead proactively trying to entice Hillary into giving him a position in the administration by offering up a bogus offering conjured out of data he had access to. This would be similar to the Manafort-gives-Kilimnik-polling-data storyline. Manafort was clearly trying to establish his 'value' to someone he was trying to entice to pay him, doing it proactively rather than being ordered to. The distinction here is that Perkins Coie / Michael Sussman were directly funded by Hillary Clinton's campaign using money laundered to them to avoid disclosures by pretending it was 'legal services', to finance her dirty ops. And Sussman was dumb enough to directly bill Hillary Clinton's campaign with a paper trail while he did it. So while there may be an argument over how much of the spying was directed / sought out, versus how much was brought to them. But either way, it was accepted and paid for. Which should make that distinction irrelevant. Now for contrast, remember the Trump Tower meeting where Trump Jr was given an unsolicited offer of supposed illegal money laundering by Hillary overseas, only to find it was a hoax by lobbyists trying to overturn the Magnitsky Act. Now imagine that instead of being unsolicited, Trump's campaign actively paid someone to go out and seek dirt on Clinton. And instead of being supposed evidence of crime, it was just vague intonations of contact with Russia. And instead of being presented as legitimate whistleblowing, it was known to be the product of electronic spying. And instead of being dismissed out of hand, they directly paid for it with billed hours, accepted it and tried to weaponize it.

What's next, did Hillary Clinton hire rogue plumbers to tap into the plumbing of Trump Tower and intercept his shits so she could pore over them and analyze their protein content?

Do you still gender cosplay?